Teams

ELanghans-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-25vs MFossum-HRLost 13
L#1 DoublesWes Cooper / Paul Kiger vs Chip McCorkle / Mark Fossum4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEdward Aiken vs Matthew Ross2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlex Sizemore / Cooper Norris vs Andrew Curso / Michael Klein6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEdmund Fernandez / Josh Clinard vs Valentin Verdier / Michael Andre6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs NPuri18-DURLost 13
W#1 DoublesEdmund Fernandez / Eric Langhans vs Ranjith Dasaradhi / Sumit Parimoo7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMitch Heath vs Sushrut Bhowmik2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacob McLennan / Paul Kiger vs Vijay Sharma / Vishal Gupta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosh Clinard / Justin Kretzschmar vs Nishant Puri / Rajeev Tonde4-6, 3-6
2026-03-07vs SPanthri-DURLost 14
L#1 DoublesEdmund Fernandez / Justin Kretzschmar vs Anish Arya / Krupal Shah1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSaad Masood vs Adam Bernstein2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCooper Norris / Mitch Heath vs Kirill Kochkin / Rajiv Nair0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesWes Cooper vs Ravi Verma3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEric Langhans / Luca Menozzi vs Kevin Kokal / Jeremy Wheelwright6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Eric Langhans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Paul Kiger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Wes Cooper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Saad Masood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Edmund Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Edward Aiken
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Justin Kretzschmar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Alex Sizemore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Cooper Norris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacob McLennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Clinard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Luca Menozzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mitch Heath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Langhans
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Paul Kiger
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Wes Cooper
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Saad Masood
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Edmund Fernandez
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Edward Aiken
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Justin Kretzschmar
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Alex Sizemore
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Cooper Norris
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Jacob McLennan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Josh Clinard
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luca Menozzi
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mitch Heath
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.