Teams

YORK:Green:McGovern

2026 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-06vs HSB:WeidknechtWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheilah McGovern / Susan Flagg vs Julianne Gillespie / Sophie Leigh6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Galligan / Heidi Hawkins vs Marlow Rahn / Kathleen Foley6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Frechette / Jo Ann Ratto Ross vs ANITA WEIDKNECHT / Deborah Weissbard Harrington6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMargie Carley / Margaret Galligan vs Kimberly Caron / kristin posternak2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Jacqueline Ann Cotter-Brousseau6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGabriella Hughes / Roberta Sullivan vs Sandra DeSisto / Nancy Haberstroh2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJo Ann Ratto Ross / Anita Alden vs Barbara Cassidy / Mallory Buck4-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs HSB:WeidknechtWon 40
W#1 DoublesMargaret Galligan / Susan Flagg vs Eileen Mahoney / Kathleen Foley6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Sophie Leigh6-4, 4-4
W#2 DoublesBarbara Green / Margie Carley vs ANITA WEIDKNECHT / Elizabeth Durkin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTannye Wold / Sheilah McGovern vs Deborah Weissbard Harrington / Jane Ingram6-1, 6-4
2026-06-02vs SFP:Lafreniere:SchmolkaLost 04
L#1 DoublesBarbara Green / Mary Quinn vs Laura Stone / Jodi Gould1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Alison Brzenchek3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargie Carley / Roberta Sullivan vs Gretchen Hagen / Kathleen Henry4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Frechette / Jo Ann Ratto Ross vs Patricia Lovejoy / Cammie Rowntree3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBarbara Green / Susan Flagg vs Kimberly Caron / kristin posternak6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJennie Chambers vs Una McGrath6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabriella Hughes / Margie Carley vs Sandra DeSisto / Holly Mills6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJo Ann Ratto Ross / Souci Rollins vs Ruth Gray / Carharine Eldred6-1, 6-4
2026-05-19vs HSB:WeidknechtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBarbara Green / Margaret Galligan vs Eileen Mahoney / Kathleen Foley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRoberta Sullivan vs Sophie Leigh0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSheilah McGovern / Tannye Wold vs Elizabeth Durkin / Deborah Weissbard Harrington6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCinde Vandette / Gabriella Hughes vs Sarah Hill / ANITA WEIDKNECHT6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-12vs SFP:Lafreniere:SchmolkaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRoberta Sullivan / Mary Quinn vs Jodi Gould / Gretchen Hagen6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Alison Brzenchek6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGabriella Hughes / Julie Frechette vs Kathleen Henry / Margot Schmolka6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennie Chambers / Sheilah McGovern vs Joanna Guarracino / Cammie Rowntree3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKristan Pavona / Heidi Hawkins vs kristin posternak / Eileen Zimmerman4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Kimberly Caron6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRoberta Sullivan / Tannye Wold vs Christie Fujimoto / Holly Mills3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Alden / Julie Frechette vs Una McGrath / Grace Pimental3-6, 5-7
2026-04-21vs SFP:Lafreniere:SchmolkaLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Quinn / Kristan Pavona vs Jodi Gould / Laura Stone3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMaryse Newton vs Alison Brzenchek3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Frechette / Heidi Hawkins vs Ann Libby / Joanna Guarracino2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Green / Cinde Vandette vs Patricia Lovejoy / Lynda Gallagher4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTS:Donahue:Scharpf08211130270
2RVC:Chaltain:Gorman08201231272
3YMCA:Champoux:Henry08141838318
4EXE:Bruno:Carnevale08141842333
5BOSS:Nardo:Dolan08112147336
6SFP:Lafreniere:Schmolka09251128275
7WWCC:OdiornePointBreakers:Zimmerman:Caron09211537324
8GH:Smith:Correia09191738299
9LNH:Bouressa09181840336
10YORK:Green:McGovern09181842330
11CON:Rauseo:Cook09162045345
12HH:Coleman:Paradie09191746360
13HSB:Weidknecht0982860388

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Susan Flagg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Jesse Kohler
published
3.29
Maryse Newton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Margaret Galligan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Margie Carley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Sheilah McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Anita Alden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cinde Vandette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Tannye Wold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Jo Ann Ratto Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kristan Pavona
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Gabriella Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Roberta Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.13
Barbara Green
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Julie Frechette
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Heidi Hawkins
published
Jennie Chambers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Souci Rollins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Chambers + Jesse Kohler20563% games+10.0% vs expected
Cinde Vandette + Barbara Green11654% games+5.8% vs expected
Sheilah McGovern + Margaret Galligan3455% games+1.7% vs expected
Margaret Galligan + Barbara Green4252% games−1.9% vs expected
Cinde Vandette + Souci Rollins1442% games−12.0% vs expected
Tannye Wold + Barbara Green3538% games−12.4% vs expected
Souci Rollins + Barbara Green5257% gamesnot enough data
Roberta Sullivan + Margie Carley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Flagg
90W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Jesse Kohler
44W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Maryse Newton
11W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Margaret Galligan
24W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Margie Carley
25W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Sheilah McGovern
33W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Anita Alden
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Cinde Vandette
18W–20L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tannye Wold
37W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jo Ann Ratto Ross
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristan Pavona
54W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Gabriella Hughes
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Roberta Sullivan
57W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Barbara Green
69W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Mary Quinn
43W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Julie Frechette
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Heidi Hawkins
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennie Chambers
50W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Souci Rollins
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.