Teams

SS-LGT NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-19vs PH REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Sutton / Sandi Plude vs Kori White / Christy Brant6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValerie Norris / Patty Weston vs Karen Boyd / Julie Picha6-2, 6-3
2025-07-10vs KC-CC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesValerie Norris / Patty Weston vs Sarah Bryan / Amy Shaw6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesInessa McGill vs Margaret Scully6-0, 6-1
2025-07-03vs SS-LGT REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesValerie Norris / Patty Weston vs Elizabeth Baesman / Soyon Bueno6-1, 6-0
2025-06-19vs LEBTC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatty Weston / Inessa McGill vs Lisa Stark / Shelby Striegel1-6, 4-6
2025-06-12vs KC-RH PINKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJan Bennett / Inessa McGill vs Shannon Buhl / Kerry Anders3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Weston / Valerie Norris vs Cheryl Alley / Anita Kinder6-1, 7-5
2025-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Fuller / Inessa McGill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Jessica Sutton
published
3.39
Valerie Norris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Karen Knight
published
3.29
Jan Bennett
published
3.20
Patty Weston
published
3.19
Sharon Johnson
published
3.10
Inessa McGill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Sandi Plude
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Mary Berg
published
2.87
Virginia Foster
published
2.76
Margaret Fuller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Norris + Patty Weston8266% games+4.5% vs expected
Sharon Johnson + Karen Knight111252% games+3.6% vs expected
Jessica Sutton + Jan Bennett13957% games+3.0% vs expected
Sandi Plude + Jan Bennett123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Berg + Margaret Fuller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Sutton
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Valerie Norris
43W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Karen Knight
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Jan Bennett
28W–26L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Patty Weston
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sharon Johnson
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Inessa McGill
70W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Sandi Plude
105W–84L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Mary Berg
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Virginia Foster
26W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Margaret Fuller
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.