Teams

Smoot

2022 Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over · Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-17vs CrawleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesLolita Blair / Lee Wroe vs Elizabeth Larson / DONALD CRAWLEY6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-12-10vs CrawleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesSean Der / Sarah Dumansky vs Henry McVeigh / Debbie Boger2-6, 4-6
2021-12-03vs CrawleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nyman / Lee Wroe vs Virginia Fung / Matthew Taylor3-6, 4-6
2021-11-20vs CrawleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Nyman / Leonard Tetteh vs Jean Lim / Henry McVeigh6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Pfister / Lee Wroe vs Esprit Cha / Henry Cha6-3, 6-3
2021-11-07vs CrawleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Leonard Tetteh vs Marketa Chromkova / Jared Fly1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Pfister / James Smoot vs Elizabeth Larson / DONALD CRAWLEY7-6, 6-1
2021-11-03vs CrawleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLolita Blair / James Smoot vs Inese Williamson / Matthew Geppi1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Leonard Tetteh vs Esprit Cha / Matthew Taylor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-24vs CrawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Leonard Tetteh vs Debbie Boger / Henry McVeigh3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
James Smoot
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Leonard Tetteh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Maureen Kolb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Lee Wroe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Sean Der
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.85
David Trang
published 4.5
Jennifer Nyman
published
Stephen Dessel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leonard Tetteh + Maureen Kolb4551% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Kolb + Sean Der213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Leonard Tetteh
338W–208L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Maureen Kolb
119W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Lee Wroe
124W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.17
4.5
Sean Der
257W–135L career · 5 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
David Trang
0W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
Jennifer Nyman
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Dessel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.