Teams

2022 Tri Level Men's 40 - Jorge Ocasio

2022 Tri Level 40 & Over · 2022 Tri Level Mens 40

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesElvin Rodriguez / Jorge J Ocasio vs Angel Hernandez / Juan Santillan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Pilier / Luis Melendez-Fox vs Heriberto Flores / Oscar Velez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRafael Vazquez Paniagua / Cesar Negron vs Jorge Reyes Otero / Luis de la Rosa6-7
W#1 DoublesElvin Rodriguez / Jorge J Ocasio vs Fernando del Valle Medina / Jose Zofakis6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamon Amado / Alejandro Rivera Pagan vs Ricardo Davila Canino / Manuel Principe Acosta6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRafael Vazquez Paniagua / Hector Rivera Martinez vs Carlos Gonzalez Cordero / Gabriel Llanos6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesEric Halais / Elvin Rodriguez vs Heriberto Caldero / Edwin Ramos1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Rivera Pagan / Luis Melendez-Fox vs Joel Melendez / Jaime Melendez Ayala2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCesar Negron / Rafael Vazquez Paniagua vs Victor Tirado / Jose Santiago1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Tri Level Mens 40 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Eric Halais
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elvin Rodriguez
published 4
3.33
Alejandro Rivera Pagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Ramon Amado
published
Cesar Negron
published 3.5
3.13
Hector Rivera Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Geoffrey Pilier
published 3.5
Jorge J Ocasio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luis Melendez-Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rafael Vazquez Paniagua
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Halais + Jorge J Ocasio224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Halais
50W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elvin Rodriguez
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Alejandro Rivera Pagan
71W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Ramon Amado
23W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cesar Negron
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Hector Rivera Martinez
47W–77L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Geoffrey Pilier
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jorge J Ocasio
31W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Luis Melendez-Fox
38W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rafael Vazquez Paniagua
77W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.