Teams

RAIN-May

2021 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-27vs WO-LamersWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Wills / Crystal May vs Tim Socia / Yancey Haas7-5, 6-0
2021-03-06vs MAC-WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Haley / Crystal May vs Morris White / Ruth Bates6-1, 6-0
2021-02-27vs CCV-ReifsniderWon 10
W#3 DoublesSonia Haley / James Andrews vs Robin Reifsnider / Patrick Toohers7-5, 4-1
2021-02-20vs ACAC-StephensLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal May / Adam Webb vs Steve Hamant / Isabel Lee4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSonia Haley / James Andrews vs Alex Neuwelt / Caroline Ogilvie2-6, 2-6
2021-02-07vs WW-RacelisLost 01
L#2 DoublesSonia Haley / James Andrews vs Joseph Racelis / Liza Hause3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-01-10vs HERM-HardestyWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Haley / Crystal May vs Sanjeev Vohra / Jennifer Morgan6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gary Wills
published 4
3.73
Crystal May
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.52
Sonia Haley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
3.26
Paul Haley
published
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.02
Donna Moody
published 3.5
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.86
Pam Koch
published
2.76
James Andrews
published 3
2.75
Kim Earle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Crystal May
243W–91L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Sonia Haley
44W–76L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
James Andrews
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Kim Earle
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.