← Teams

MAC-Bowie/Shirk

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Christy MacColl
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Sally Papadimas
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Ellen Wood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-10Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Melinee Steck vs Kim Tellin / Susan Elmer6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristy MacColl vs Jill Boyce6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Wendy Smith vs Ann Hays / Diana Crawford6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Walker / Ellen Wood vs Jeane Anastas / Geni Geannopoulos7-5, 6-4
2022-06-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Lynn Brown vs Patricia Eargle / Nancy Salisbury6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Wendy Smith vs Chris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Walker / Ellen Wood vs Cricket Forsey / Lisa McBee6-2, 6-3
2022-06-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Melinee Steck vs Lucila Griesser / Rhonda Baker6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Kerri Patrick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSally Papadimas / Wendy Smith vs Anne Stein-Gray / Lisa Mayer6-1, 6-3
2022-05-15Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesLynn Brown / Christy MacColl vs Nicole Smith / Jane King Ayers2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Jing Li6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSally Papadimas / Dorothy Cofield vs Dipali Dixit / Wendy Carlson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Andria Shirk vs Sherie Briggs / Victoria Chamberlain6-1, 6-4
2022-05-01Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Lynn Brown vs Kiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesChristy MacColl vs Victoria Cartwright6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Sally Papadimas vs Elizabeth Maguire / Nancy Salisbury6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Edwards / Susan Sienko vs Lisa McBee / Cricket Forsey6-3, 6-1
2022-04-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLynn Brown / Christy MacColl vs Robin Welter / Nicole Vedder6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSally Papadimas / Debbie Ackroyd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAndria Shirk / Susan Sienko vs Kerri Patrick / Sharon Place6-1, 6-4
2022-04-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesWendy Smith / Susan Sienko vs Mihee Park / Betty Roux6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Heather Edwards vs Wanda Ng / Jinmi Kemple6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Ackroyd / Ellen Wood vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Megan Clifford6-2, 6-2
2022-04-16Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesLynn Brown / Sally Papadimas vs Gail Bolte / Alena Lauritsen6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Xia Yuan6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Heather Edwards vs Hildie Oliver / Kate Wilkinson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Christy MacColl vs Kyle McAvoy / Robin Lanahan6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christy MacColl
32W–13L career
0%85%15%
3.46
3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76
3
Sally Papadimas
48W–101L career
9%91%0%
2.64
3
Ellen Wood
43W–79L career · type A
20%80%0%
2.56
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.