Teams

Liu/META

2026 Adult 40 & Over-META · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-16vs Taylor-Woods/METASplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaryl Addison / Matt Lavinder vs Benjamin Croux / Lance Taylor2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulio Lanfranco vs Jerry Vaughn6-4, 6-4
2026-05-13vs Taylor-Woods/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesJim Green / Matt Snyder vs Ricky Frye / Paul Culpepper3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulio Lanfranco vs Jerry Vaughn6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Sturgill / Fernando Subijana vs Joshua Woods / Benjamin Croux0-6, 1-6
2026-05-10vs Taylor-Woods/METALost 02
L#1 DoublesDaryl Addison / Simon Temperton vs Benjamin Croux / Ricky Frye4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesScott Higgins vs Todd Wenzel2-6, 0-6
2026-05-05vs Taylor-Woods/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesDaryl Addison / Fernando Subijana vs Lance Taylor / Jeffrey Miller6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesScott Higgins vs Steven Fox0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKe Liu / Simon Temperton vs Bart Kennedy / Rodger Acklin2-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Taylor-Woods/METALost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Green / Matt Lavinder vs Jeffrey Miller / Lance Taylor6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDaryl Addison vs Randy Belt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTim Sturgill / Simon Temperton vs Ricky Frye / Paul Culpepper0-6, 4-6
2026-04-29vs Taylor-Woods/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesTim Sturgill / Simon Temperton vs Benjamin Croux / Bart Kennedy0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesScott Higgins vs Eric Pope2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKe Liu / Fernando Subijana vs Joshua Woods / Jeffrey Miller6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Fernando Subijana
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Simon Temperton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Daryl Addison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.54
Julio Lanfranco
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Tim Sturgill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Scott Higgins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jim Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fernando Subijana
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Simon Temperton
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Daryl Addison
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Julio Lanfranco
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Tim Sturgill
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Scott Higgins
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jim Green
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.