Teams

Matthews, R 2022 Combo

2022 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Mens 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-10vs Matthews, BWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Buda / Bryan McCabe vs Bradley Matthews / Adam Pflaumer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-05vs Matthews, BWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlie Lamb / Bryan McCabe vs Brett Teeter / Laurence Nadeau6-3, 6-2
2022-09-26vs Matthews, BWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Buda / Bryan McCabe vs William Futch / Stephen MacKinnon6-1, 6-2
2022-09-17vs Matthews, BLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan McCabe / Michael Martorelli vs Keith Thomas / Brett Teeter6-7, 2-6
2022-08-31vs Matthews, BWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Lamb / Bryan McCabe vs Bradley Matthews / Gino Galutera6-2, 6-4
2022-08-20vs Matthews, BWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Bryan McCabe vs Brett Teeter / John Rho6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Buda
published 4.5
3.92
Michael Martorelli
published
3.86
3.81
Charlie Lamb
published 4
3.76
Bryan McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.63
Jeremy Lozito
published
3.60
Steve Peterson
published
3.60
Joshua Phanco
published
Anthony Martino
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Lozito + Steve Peterson2449% games−7.2% vs expected
Steve Peterson + Bryan McCabe314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Buda
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Martorelli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Joshua Kleinstuber
61W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Charlie Lamb
22W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Bryan McCabe
224W–123L career · 11 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Jeremy Lozito
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Steve Peterson
16W–21L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Joshua Phanco
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Anthony Martino
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.