Teams

KBuckel-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-07vs ROakley-EVLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Feldt / Leon Grodski Barrera vs Aaron Young / Zach Rowles4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Buckel / Max Lipshitz vs Ryan Boyles / Richard Griffin1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMatt Carter / Andrew Hedgpeth vs Chris Reeves / Rick Edmunds0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-23vs DNagelhout-HSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hedgpeth / Max Lipshitz vs Michael Holt / Dave Thomas6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatt Carter / Leon Grodski Barrera vs Cory Draughon / David Nagelhout3-6, 4-6
2025-09-16vs JRussell-DFCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Hedgpeth / Leon Grodski Barrera vs Matthew Sears / Jeff Russell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCory Liverman / Keith Buckel vs Donald Berger / Bruce Elvin1-6, 3-6
2025-09-09vs SClausnitzer-CHCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hedgpeth / John Kim vs Richard Woods / Casey Gilley7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCory Liverman / FJ Magee vs Matt Moody / Ryan Bialas1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Keith Buckel vs Juan Munster / Scott Davies5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-26vs PBream-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Kim / Leon Grodski Barrera vs James White / Seth Noar7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-19vs MFossum-HRLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeon Grodski Barrera / FJ Magee vs Mark Fossum / Sam Mathias7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Buckel / Marvin Davis vs Thomas Johnston / James Bowers1-6, 0-6
2025-08-15vs DNagelhout-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Buckel / Leon Grodski Barrera vs Ralph Russo / Jeff Denhard0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Max Lipshitz
published
3.17
Andrew Hedgpeth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.06
Matthew Feldt
published
2.82
Terrence Hawkins
published
2.79
Leon Grodski Barrera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Matt Carter
published
2.65
Marvin Davis
published
2.63
Keith Buckel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.47
FJ Magee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leon Grodski Barrera + Keith Buckel2538% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Lipshitz
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3
Andrew Hedgpeth
64W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Matthew Feldt
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
Terrence Hawkins
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Leon Grodski Barrera
106W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Matt Carter
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Marvin Davis
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Keith Buckel
53W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
FJ Magee
24W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.