Teams

KY/LOU/TICHENOR/RADASCH

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/MANGOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Hamilton / Christie Wafford vs Mary Jennings / Sarah Gorman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristy Dugan vs Stephanie Metten2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulianne Horn / Michele Horn vs Becca Haynes / Stephanie Virtue6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Christie Wafford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Michele Horn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
3.31
3.28
Dolores Radasch
published
3.27
Deborah Wathen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Aiysha Billings
published 3.5
3.21
Holly Tichenor
published
3.19
Katy Andrews
published
3.17
Alice Shade
published 3.5
3.15
Jane Buckey
published
3.15
Kristy Dugan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Chelsea Hartmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Allison Luckett
published 3
Jayme Wurtenberger
published
Julianne Horn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Lucchese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Wafford + Holly Tichenor2449% games+5.8% vs expected
Holly Tichenor + Alice Shade224 matchesnot enough data
Aiysha Billings + Alice Shade134 matchesnot enough data
Dolores Radasch + Jane Buckey123 matchesnot enough data
Jane Buckey + Alice Shade033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christie Wafford
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Michele Horn
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Rebecca Hatch-Purnell
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jennifer Dawn Haas-Travis
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Dolores Radasch
12W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Deborah Wathen
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aiysha Billings
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Holly Tichenor
12W–26L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Katy Andrews
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Alice Shade
20W–32L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jane Buckey
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Kristy Dugan
16W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Chelsea Hartmann
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Allison Luckett
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Jayme Wurtenberger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julianne Horn
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Lucchese
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.