Teams

McDonald/Nashville

2025 Mixed 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Mixed - Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-12vs Collins/Bargers/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesNadim Arnouk / Suzanne Cox vs Stuart Littleton / Suzanne Sampietro3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSagar Shah / Lisa Blalock vs Salvador Barajas / Jennifer Kistner6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrent Jean / Susanna Vaughan vs Adam Carter / Sue Collins5-7, 3-6
2025-06-07vs Collins/Bargers/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Cox / Yale Riley vs Adam Carter / Jennifer Kistner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynelle McDonald / Nadim Arnouk vs Suzanne Sampietro / Kelly Baldwin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Jean / Crystal Wray vs Becky Husi / John Amis6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed - Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Crystal Wray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Suzanne Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Yale Riley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Charles Yeager
published 4
3.60
Susanna Vaughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Michelle Salada
published
3.59
Brent Jean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Nadim Arnouk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Brian Shubert
published 4
3.42
Lynelle McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Sagar Shah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Lisa Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Jean + Crystal Wray3249% gamesnot enough data
Susanna Vaughan + Brent Jean314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Shubert + Suzanne Cox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal Wray
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Suzanne Cox
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68
Yale Riley
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Charles Yeager
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Susanna Vaughan
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Michelle Salada
12W–35L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Brent Jean
8W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Nadim Arnouk
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Brian Shubert
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Lynelle McDonald
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Sagar Shah
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Lisa Blalock
5W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.