Teams

ZEPHYR COVE 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Cheri Von Bargen
published 4
3.52
Miriam DeQuadros
published
3.49
Kristy Wertz
published
3.44
Sandra Laskey
published
3.40
Diane Sheridan
published 3.5
3.38
Shelley Lober
published
3.36
Tamara Crawford
published
3.33
Becky Darrow
published 3.5
3.29
Jessica Schnoll
published
3.26
Melinda Choy
published
3.20
Mallory Snyder
published
3.18
Carolyn Wright
published 3.5
3.17
Deniece Mailloux
published 3.5
3.10
Cecille Florentino
published 3.5
2.84
Carol Faccinetti
published 3
2.81
Brandi Caskey
published 3
2.73
Barbara Cooper
published 3
2.65
Laurie Schmid
published
Kay Warneke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Laskey + Cheri Von Bargen303 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Laskey + Jessica Schnoll303 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Crawford + Becky Darrow303 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Snyder + Melinda Choy213 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Schnoll + Carol Faccinetti213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheri Von Bargen
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kristy Wertz
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sandra Laskey
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Diane Sheridan
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tamara Crawford
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Becky Darrow
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jessica Schnoll
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Melinda Choy
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Mallory Snyder
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Deniece Mailloux
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cecille Florentino
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Carol Faccinetti
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brandi Caskey
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Barbara Cooper
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Laurie Schmid
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Kay Warneke
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.