Teams

OVP/Dean 7.5

2023 COTA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over Business - Summer · 7.5 Bus Combo

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Bus Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Rebecca Rea
published
3.60
Brionne Antwine
published 4
3.58
Tamara Suiza
published
3.50
Shelly Stratton
published
3.40
Rebecca Poulson
published
3.36
Pamela Leed
published
3.27
Melissa Harshman
published
3.22
Trudy Goeckel
published
3.20
Elizabeth Sadler
published
3.18
3.14
Sonya Peacock
published
3.12
Donna Fiorenza
published
3.07
Sheila Devaney
published
3.06
Lisa Oconnor
published
2.96
Kristina Britton
published
2.77
Patricia Kohle
published
2.73
Sallie Hale
published
2.62
Tammy Tiller
published
2.50
Cheryl Dean
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Harshman + Trudy Goeckel7166% games+19.9% vs expected
Cheryl Dean + Lisa Oconnor5153% games+15.6% vs expected
Rebecca Rea + Brionne Antwine7260% games+11.9% vs expected
Patricia Kohle + Sallie Hale2441% games+9.4% vs expected
Melissa Harshman + Shelly Stratton291060% games+7.1% vs expected
Rebecca Rea + Trudy Goeckel3346% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Harshman + Sonya Peacock224 matchesnot enough data
Brionne Antwine + Elsa Victoria Bertran134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Rea
58W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Brionne Antwine
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Tamara Suiza
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Shelly Stratton
33W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Rebecca Poulson
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
Pamela Leed
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Melissa Harshman
65W–27L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Trudy Goeckel
24W–27L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Elizabeth Sadler
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.20
Elsa Victoria Bertran
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.18
Sonya Peacock
67W–35L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Donna Fiorenza
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sheila Devaney
19W–38L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lisa Oconnor
11W–20L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kristina Britton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
Patricia Kohle
16W–42L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.77
Sallie Hale
20W–36L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Tammy Tiller
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cheryl Dean
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.