Teams

Thomasville/Parker

2023 Flint River USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-25vs Camilla/ShiverSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCandace Beauvais / Rhonda Tullos vs Cindy Anglin / Patty Lee3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGina Herring / Holly Harrison vs Debbie Coleman / Laura Beth Tucker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-18vs Albany/CurtisWon 20
W#1 DoublesGina Herring / Elaine Rudd vs Layne Cox / Joan Lake2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIrene Gleason / Rhonda Tullos vs Leslie Bacon / Kay Rowland6-0, 6-0
2023-02-12vs Flint River/Donna TrammellWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaine Rudd / Rhonda Tullos vs Sheila Edwards / Susie Hartzog6-2, 6-3
2023-02-04vs Camilla/ShiverWon 10
W#1 DoublesCandace Beauvais / Rhonda Tullos vs Patty Lee / Becky Bush6-4, 6-2
2023-01-28vs Albany/CurtisWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Harrison / Gina Herring vs Leslie Bacon / Melinda Henley7-5, 6-1
2023-01-21vs Flint River/Donna TrammellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Elaine Rudd vs Susie Hartzog / Amy Thomas6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarson Parker / Gina Herring vs Karan Barber / Niki Cox7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.32
Elaine Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Paige Saunders
published
Candace Beauvais
published 3.5
Irene Gleason
published 3.5
3.19
Carson Parker
published 3.5
3.19
Gina Herring
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Stephanie Bixler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Rudd + Gina Herring7850% games+3.9% vs expected
Rhonda Tullos + Gina Herring122545% games+3.7% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Rhonda Tullos181448% games+3.4% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Paige Saunders303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Paige Saunders
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Candace Beauvais
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Irene Gleason
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carson Parker
17W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gina Herring
212W–283L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.19
Stephanie Bixler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.