Teams

McElhany - PCC

2025 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-16vs Escambia/Haigler/40&Over3.0MLost 05
L#1 DoublesJames Grant / Mike Esmonde vs Beau Bullard / Tracy Schmidt1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrody Mcelhany vs Rick Bucco2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRhett James / Greg Digby vs Jonathan Llanera / Jeffrey Henderson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHunter Stark / Eric Rasmussen vs Will Grace / Jaymes Tran0-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesShamus Prindiville / Joshua Lewis vs Clay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill0-6, 6-7
2025-03-05vs Escambia/Haigler/40&Over3.0MLost 23
L#1 DoublesHunter Stark / Joshua Lewis vs Clay Anderson / Matthew O'Neill2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrody Mcelhany vs Jeffrey Henderson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMike Esmonde / Shamus Prindiville vs A Haigler / Will Grace6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEric Rasmussen / James Grant vs Tracy Schmidt / Beau Bullard0-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesBrad Mathis / Rhett James vs Jonathan Llanera / Jaymes Tran6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Shamus Prindiville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Gregory Vierheilig
published
Brad Mathis
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Mike Esmonde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Matthew Myer
published
2.66
Joshua Lewis
published
2.65
Brody Mcelhany
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
Eric Rasmussen
published
2.56
Hunter Stark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Greg Digby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Grant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Nissley
published
Rhett James
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Lewis + Shamus Prindiville314 matchesnot enough data
Brody Mcelhany + Matthew Myer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shamus Prindiville
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Gregory Vierheilig
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brad Mathis
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mike Esmonde
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Matthew Myer
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Joshua Lewis
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Brody Mcelhany
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Eric Rasmussen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Hunter Stark
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Greg Digby
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
James Grant
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Nissley
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhett James
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.