Teams

BUF: Ace Kickers

2024 40&Over Women · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-17vs Tough LoveWon 40
W#1 DoublesSandra Picerno / Paula Zagrobelny vs Donna Decarolis / Lilian Mclellan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Leberer vs Pamela Rauh6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Powell / Joanne Mendiola vs Virginia Filiaci / Susan Robbins7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Perna / Laurel Oliver vs Kim Athans / Candice Uzarowski6-3, 6-2
2024-07-10vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 31
W#1 DoublesSandra Picerno / Amy Hulse vs Jeannine Higgins / Sarah Rugnetta6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPaula Zagrobelny vs Marsha Huard6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Gelder / Gail Raimond vs Holly Freed / Lisa Streng6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurel Oliver / Joanne Mendiola vs Ruthanne Wannop / Heather Wronski-Garland5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-26vs Tough LoveWon 31
W#1 DoublesKathleen Lucey / Paula Zagrobelny vs Lilian Mclellan / Donna Decarolis3-6, 3-4
L#1 SinglesKaren Perna vs Pamela Rauh4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Lunghino / Cheryl Gelder vs Susan Robbins / Penny Cipolla6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Hulse / Gail Raimond vs Jennifer Kacala / Candice Uzarowski6-3, 6-3
2024-06-19vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Perna / Amy Hulse vs Tessa Flores / Jessica Schimert6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Leberer vs Marsha Huard6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoanne Mendiola / Holly Powell vs Sherry Frost / Sarah Rugnetta6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGail Raimond / Sandra Picerno vs Lisa Streng / Holly Freed6-1, 6-1
2024-05-29vs Tough LoveSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Lucey / Sandra Picerno vs Donna Decarolis / Lilian Mclellan6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAimee Leberer vs Pamela Rauh2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Perna / Julie Lunghino vs Penny Cipolla / Virginia Filiaci7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurel Oliver / Gail Raimond vs Jennifer Kacala / Candice Uzarowski6-3, 6-2
2024-05-15vs May the Tape Be With YouWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Perna / Julie Lunghino vs Kathleen Blackwell / Heather Wronski-Garland6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAimee Leberer vs Tessa Flores3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lucey / Amy Hulse vs Ruthanne Wannop / Sherry Frost2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Powell / Cheryl Gelder vs Holly Freed / Rhonda Wieder6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BUF: Ace Kickers0619515167
2Tough Love06131125194
3May the Tape Be With You0642042264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Laurel Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Holly Powell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Karen Perna
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.97
Sandra Picerno
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Amy Hulse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Aimee Leberer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Paula Zagrobelny
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Cheryl Gelder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Gail Raimond
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Joanne Mendiola
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Kathleen Lucey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Lunghino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Gelder + Laurel Oliver9172% games+9.5% vs expected
Julie Lunghino + Karen Perna11263% games+3.5% vs expected
Gail Raimond + Amy Hulse11359% games+0.2% vs expected
Paula Zagrobelny + Sandra Picerno8450% games−0.4% vs expected
Julie Lunghino + Cheryl Gelder404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Perna + Holly Powell404 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Gelder + Amy Hulse404 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Picerno + Laurel Oliver314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurel Oliver
50W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Holly Powell
21W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
Karen Perna
66W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Sandra Picerno
77W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Amy Hulse
44W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Aimee Leberer
34W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3.5
Paula Zagrobelny
117W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Cheryl Gelder
34W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Gail Raimond
44W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joanne Mendiola
43W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.73
Kathleen Lucey
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Julie Lunghino
43W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.