Teams

SGV Noobies-Lee-WN/SU2

2022 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Rand Lee vs Pulkit Mathur / Eduardo Castanon6-3, 6-4
2022-06-05vs SGV Alphalete-Lim-Arroyo High/SU1Split 11
L#1 SinglesEli Alejo vs Mark Messana3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / David Lui vs Anthony Lim / Justin Belisario6-1, 6-2
2022-05-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesEli Alejo vs Zach Vinegar6-1, 6-0
2022-05-21vs SGV Triforces - Li-WN/SA 10Won 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / James Lucero vs Jonathan Talbot / Martin Chi6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEli Alejo vs George Llewellyn6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / James Agnes vs Yukishi Yamamoto / Tomas Wong6-7, 5-7
2022-04-24vs SGV Dare Doubles-Maroun-WN/SU2Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Joshua Tesoro vs Sam Qian / Gustavo Banderas6-3, 6-0
2022-04-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesEli Alejo / James Agnes vs Do Hun Kim / Ryan J Woo6-3, 6-1
2022-04-03vs SGV Skyline- Chan - WN/SU8Split 11
L#1 DoublesEli Alejo / James Agnes vs Jerry Waliry / David Johnson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Mathew Gonzales vs Sony Soegiarto / Allen Ancheta6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Jamie Wei
published 5
4.26
Eli Alejo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
James Lucero
published 4.5
4.03
Sam Yang
published
3.99
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.96
James Agnes
published 4
3.92
David Lui
published 4
Hea Kim
published 4
3.60
Rand Lee
published
3.47
SAL DEGUZMAN
published 3.5
3.43
Jeffrey Kwok
published
Jordan Cheng
published
Joshua Tesoro
published
Mathew Gonzales
published
Patrick Lustado
published
Reeve Alvin Estioko
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jamie Wei
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.87
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
James Lucero
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sam Yang
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
James Agnes
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
David Lui
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Hea Kim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rand Lee
2W–20L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
SAL DEGUZMAN
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jeffrey Kwok
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Jordan Cheng
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Tesoro
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mathew Gonzales
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Lustado
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Reeve Alvin Estioko
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.