Teams

LA - Sure Shots

2022 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-03vs LA - JBeesWon 10
W#1 DoublesRomi Worst / Karie Lanterman vs Elaine Low / Sheba ZamanZadeh6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-19vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Boston / Elizabeth Trenbeth vs Sirin Sanglimsuwan / Caroline Harris2-6, 2-6
2022-11-05vs LA - Get a GripWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Boston / Soo Fujishige vs Cindy Shih / Rene Farah6-0, 7-6
2022-10-23vs LA - Ball BustersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Boston / Sonjia Harper vs Soleil Blaize / Jeannie Witty3-6, 0-6
2022-10-08vs LA-LLW-Dare Doubles-Karen ChouSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMelanie Boston / Vernell Neal vs Karen Chou / Janina Morrison1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Bradley / Karie Lanterman vs Elena Howell / Keleigh Morgan6-4, 4-3
2022-09-17vs LA - Volley GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTarra Barahona / Melanie Boston vs Andrea Shintani / Laura Lemle Birch1-6, 4-6
2022-09-10vs LA - Downtown AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Sonomi Deguchi vs Alexandra Kovach / Christina Buckley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Sonomi Deguchi
published
2.93
Romi Worst
published
2.76
Katherine Rice
published
2.73
Sharon Alston
published 3
2.72
Vernell Neal
published
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Soo Fujishige
published
2.55
Tarra Barahona
published
2.47
Melanie Boston
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Sharon Bradley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Rice + Sharon Alston3546% games−11.2% vs expected
Karie Lanterman + Melanie Boston2748% gamesnot enough data
Soo Fujishige + Sharon Bradley4353% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Rice + Vernell Neal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonomi Deguchi
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Romi Worst
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
Katherine Rice
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Vernell Neal
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Soo Fujishige
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Tarra Barahona
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Melanie Boston
14W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Sharon Bradley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.