MARIN TC 65AW8.0A

2026 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule10 played

2026-04-09vs WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AW8.0AWon 2–1

W#1 DoublesSally Kingshill-Alarie / Suzanne Seavey vs Miho Bell / Julie Wallunas5-7, 6-4, 1-0

W#2 DoublesDebbie Miskell / Martha Pearl vs Torrey Wall / Mary Johnson3-6, 7-5, 1-0

L#3 DoublesJenifer Gill / Carol Debello vs Cecile Chenevey / Becky Reiss0-6, 2-6

2026-04-08vs VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW8.0ALost 1–2

W#1 DoublesNancy Martin / Patty Hanson vs Lisa Snowden / Karen Gee7-5, 2-1

L#2 DoublesMartha Pearl / Margo Holt vs Judy Cummins / Dixie King2-6, 4-6

L#3 DoublesDebbie Miskell / Susan Wirta vs Lisa Maral / Dolores Schmidt2-6, 3-6

2026-04-07vs VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW8.0ALost 0–3

L#1 DoublesDebbie Miskell / Carol Debello vs Lisa Maral / Karen Gee4-6, 1-6

L#2 DoublesNancy Martin / Sally Kingshill-Alarie vs Judy Cummins / Ning Docena5-7, 3-6

L#3 DoublesSusan Wirta / Karen Rocco vs Judy Miller / Valerie Fung-A-Ling3-6, 7-5, 1-0

2026-04-02vs BOYLE PK 65AW8.0ALost 0–3

L#1 DoublesMartha Pearl / Susan Wirta vs Ana Jawerbaum / Ellen Bruni-Gillies0-6, 3-6

L#2 DoublesDelia Tamayo / Debbie Miskell vs Catherine Kennedy / Lyn Little4-6, 3-6

L#3 DoublesKaren Rocco / Jenifer Gill vs Beth McCarthy / Mary Carse2-6, 0-6

2026-03-25vs WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AW8.0ALost 0–3

L#1 DoublesLouise Loeber / Debbie Miskell vs Miho Bell / Jane Gee4-6, 0-6

L#2 DoublesSusan Wirta / Margo Holt vs Garbo Berger / Julie Wallunas3-6, 1-6

L#3 DoublesDelia Tamayo / Carol Debello vs Laurie Lowery / Torrey Wall3-6, 6-7

2026-03-19vs BERKELEY TC 65AW8.0AWon 3–0

W#1 DoublesDelia Tamayo / Debbie Miskell vs Barbara Marienthal / Laurie Watters2-6, 6-4, 1-0

W#2 DoublesNancy Martin / Susan Wirta vs Lyn Hunter / Thelma Lancaster6-4, 2-6, 1-0

W#3 DoublesKaren Rocco / Louise Loeber vs Sandra Diliberto / Judy Gonzalez-Massih4-6, 7-6, 1-0

2026-03-12vs BERKELEY TC 65AW8.0ASplit 1–1

L#1 DoublesSuzanne Seavey / Nancy Martin vs Kathleen Heinze / Barbara Marienthal7-6, 6-7, 0-1

W#2 DoublesSally Kingshill-Alarie / Karen Rocco vs Thelma Lancaster / Sandra Diliberto6-2, 6-2

2026-03-03vs VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW8.0AWon 2–1

W#1 DoublesNancy Martin / Margo Holt vs Valerie Fung-A-Ling / Babe Franey6-4, 7-6

L#2 DoublesMartha Pearl / Susan Wirta vs Lisa Maral / Karen Gee1-6, 3-6

W#3 DoublesSuzanne Seavey / Elaine Kitano vs Laura Townsend / Judy Miller6-1, 6-1

2026-02-27vs BOYLE PK 65AW8.0AWon 2–1

L#1 DoublesCarol Debello / Sally Kingshill-Alarie vs Beth McCarthy / Catherine Kennedy4-6, 1-6

W#2 DoublesDebbie Miskell / Nancy Martin vs Natasha Volovik / Catherine Billecci6-3, 6-1

W#3 DoublesSuzanne Seavey / Elaine Kitano vs Ana Jawerbaum / Candace Davenport6-1, 7-5

2026-02-10vs BERKELEY TC 65AW8.0ALost 1–2

L#1 DoublesCarol Debello / Delia Tamayo vs Barbara Marienthal / Laurie Watters2-6, 0-6

L#2 DoublesSally Kingshill-Alarie / Jenifer Gill vs Judy Gonzalez-Massih / Nancy Rupprecht3-6, 1-6

W#3 DoublesDebbie Miskell / Karen Rocco vs Ina Bendich / Thelma Lancaster6-3, 6-3

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings16 teams · Women's 8.0

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1SHARON HTS CC 65AW8.0A	10	0	23	7	20	216
2BOYLE PK 65AW8.0A	8	2	24	6	16	213
3JOHNSON RANCH 65AW8.0A	8	2	22	8	23	242
4GOLD RIVER RC 65AW8.0A	7	3	18	12	27	262
5LADERA OAKS 65AW8.0A	6	4	20	10	26	245
6WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AW8.0A	6	4	18	12	27	236
7CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A	6	4	14	16	32	251
8RIO DEL MAR 65AW8.0A	6	4	16	14	35	288
9VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW8.0A	5	5	16	14	31	261
10MARIN TC 65AW8.0A	5	5	13	17	39	299
11SEASCAPE SC 65AW8.0A	3	7	12	18	40	291
12DAVIS TC/DAVIS HS 65AW8.0A	3	7	11	19	44	315
13LOS GATOS SR 65AW8.0A	2	8	10	20	43	299
14GOLD RIVER RC 65AW8.0B	2	8	9	21	46	312
15CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 65AW8.0A	2	8	5	25	52	340
16BERKELEY TC 65AW8.0A	1	9	4	26	54	334

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87

Suzanne Seavey

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.80

Nancy Martin

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

3.72

Elaine Kitano

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.60

Sally Kingshill-Alarie

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

3.58

Martha Pearl

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published —

3.52

Susan Wirta

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.46

Delia Tamayo

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.45

Debbie Miskell

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

3.35

Carol Debello

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.27

Margo Holt

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Jenifer Gill

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Karen Rocco

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

—

Louise Loeber

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Patty Hanson

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Wirta + Martha Pearl	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Suzanne Seavey

4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026

<1%84%16%

3.87

—

Nancy Martin

6W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026

1%93%6%

3.80

Elaine Kitano

14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026

5%94%1%

3.72

—

Sally Kingshill-Alarie

2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026

21%78%<1%

3.60

—

Martha Pearl

6W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026

27%73%<1%

3.58

—

Susan Wirta

5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026

45%55%<1%

3.52

Delia Tamayo

1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026

61%39%<1%

3.46

3.5

Debbie Miskell

4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%65%35%

3.45

Carol Debello

0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

87%13%<1%

3.35

—

Margo Holt

12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

2%94%4%

3.27

—

Jenifer Gill

0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Karen Rocco

3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Louise Loeber

3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Patty Hanson

1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.