Teams

SFV Ace Kickers

SFV-Adult 18 & Over-WeekDay · SFV Women 4.0 Weekday

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-07vs LLW - Team Carter - Cindi CarterLost 02
L#1 DoublesLupe Lopez / Carrie Haber vs Cindi Carter / Alison Latiolait6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie DeSanto vs Penapa Frick2-6, 0-6
2021-04-30vs SFV Strung OverWon 10
W#2 DoublesLupe Lopez / Elyse Gainor vs Elaine Parker / Anne Star6-3, 6-0
2021-04-23vs SFV iAceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie DeSanto / Barbara Brabec vs Theresa Chase / Mikaela Nagler7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-16vs SFV Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie DeSanto / Susie Shoop vs Teresa Loveland / Annie Schwartz6-2, 6-3
2021-04-02vs LLW - Team Carter - Cindi CarterWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie DeSanto / Pam Epstein-Cohen vs Roxanne Basso / Tess de Los Reyes6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carrie Haber
published 4.5
4.00
Cynthia Tribull
published 4
3.75
Susie Shoop
published
Colleen Moryl
published 4
3.74
Moira Fiore
published
3.63
Lupe Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Elyse Gainor
published 4
3.62
Julie DeSanto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Julie Blackwell
published
3.60
Schuyler Grant
published
3.29
Arianne Rudes
published 3.5
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
3.16
Adele Slaughter
published 3.5
3.05
Barbara Brabec
published 3.5
Nichole Carlin
published
Pam Epstein-Cohen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Gainor + Adele Slaughter121445% games+8.5% vs expected
Lupe Lopez + Adele Slaughter033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Blackwell + Cynthia Tribull213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carrie Haber
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Cynthia Tribull
96W–66L career · no lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
4.00
Susie Shoop
20W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Colleen Moryl
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Moira Fiore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 2 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Elyse Gainor
46W–42L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Julie DeSanto
23W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Julie Blackwell
10W–12L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
Schuyler Grant
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Arianne Rudes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Adele Slaughter
163W–167L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Barbara Brabec
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
Nichole Carlin
3W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pam Epstein-Cohen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.