Teams

Long/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.5 Men - Saturday PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-16vs Young/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesEugene Spencer / Fred Cawthon vs Talbott Young / Campbell Luschen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Allen / Lorenzo Windrow vs VIVEK KAPUR / Michael Ladd6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-26vs Young/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMillard Collins / Adrian Jones vs Ryan Moss / Alex Paz6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Beard vs Anuragh Mudakatte4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Morris / Willie Tyus vs Damon Reid / Talbott Young1-6, 0-6
2024-10-05vs Feyes/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaMicheal McLean / Lorenzo Windrow vs Brad Dunn / Chris Smeltzer1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFred Cawthon / Brandon Marshall vs Rob Whitley / Michael Ellsworth3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMillard Collins / Eugene Spencer vs Aaron Farris / Jeffrey Wolfe6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men - Saturday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Matthew Beard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Lorenzo Windrow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Fred Cawthon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Eugene Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
David Long
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Millard Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Brandon Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Adrian Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
DaMicheal McLean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Willie Tyus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eugene Spencer + Millard Collins134 matchesnot enough data
David Long + Matthew Beard213 matchesnot enough data
David Long + Millard Collins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Beard
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lorenzo Windrow
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Fred Cawthon
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Eugene Spencer
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
David Long
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Millard Collins
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Brandon Marshall
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Adrian Jones
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
DaMicheal McLean
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Willie Tyus
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.