Teams

Farmington Lord

2022 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-01vs Glenmore FreemanLost 01
L#3 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Ann Hay Hardy vs Allison Egidi / Carol Haig3-6, 4-6
2022-10-11vs Glenmore FreemanLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Loring Woodriff vs Allison Egidi / Carol Haig1-6, 1-6
2022-10-04vs Tri To Beat UsWon 10
W#3 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Ann Hay Hardy vs Elizabeth Glover / Tamara Murray7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-13vs ACAC Breaking BadWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Patti Pate vs Lizzie Godschall / Karin Jones6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Loring Woodriff
published 3
2.86
2.75
Jill Lord
published
Dianna Gibson
published 3
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Ann Horner
published 3
2.56
Shannon Mrazik
published
2.40
Patti Pate
published
Joan Mower
published
Tracy Burpee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Elizabeth Pollard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
Jill Lord
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Dianna Gibson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ann Horner
5W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Shannon Mrazik
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Patti Pate
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.40
Joan Mower
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Burpee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.