Teams

APR-E RED

2024 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-25vs GPTC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsey Berlin / Shawn Iben vs Benjamin Reimer / Lexi Yost7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Hong / David Tulloch vs Katherine Barston / Jacob Bautista Baugh2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji vs Felipe Quiroga / Molly Shinners6-2, 7-6
2024-08-18vs CACM BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsey Berlin / Shawn Iben vs W Hancock / Diem Phan-Boyer6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJacob Burg / Janice Jensen vs Cydney Springer / Robert Saddler6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIrina Suyumova / David Tulloch vs Amy Springer / Ali Barghelame6-2, 6-3
2024-08-11vs CP ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelsey Berlin / Shawn Iben vs Thomas Cauchi / McCall Board3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Hong / Andres Seijas vs Rachel Frisz / Thorn Luth4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Jensen / Nabeel Meghji vs Mallory Karr / Joshua Landau4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-04vs WP GOLDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacob Burg / Janice Jensen vs Jake Hugenberg / Emily Hay-Arthur6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesIrina Suyumova / David Tulloch vs Marina Sterngold / Sreekanth P K6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Michelle Degitis vs Terming Chew / Lucas Puiggari7-5, 6-1
2024-07-28vs DTP YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesHector Valentin / Taryn Smallwood vs Jose Amador / Michelle Foreman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Berlin / David Tulloch vs Katherine Richey / Nicholas Hoelmer5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Degitis / Nabeel Meghji vs Maeve Kearney / Christopher McCarthy4-6, 4-6
2024-07-21vs WP NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesTaryn Smallwood / Jacob Burg vs Natalie Hirschfeld / Miles Doane3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelsey Berlin / Shawn Iben vs Andy Duncan / Jill Barghelame6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Irina Suyumova vs Peter Nicolson / Carlie Odau5-7, 2-6
2024-07-14vs NJ ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesTaryn Smallwood / Jacob Burg vs Anne Steputis / Riley Steputis3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Hong / Andres Seijas vs Hank Fisher / Suzanne Watkins6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNabeel Meghji / Michelle Degitis vs Hadley Fisher / Kirstin Kraig7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MIXED 8.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BP NAVY5215617173
2MC TEAL5212923209
3APR-E RED5212923188
4WP SILVER429921166
5SS-LGT NAVY1651633212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Shawn Iben
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Michelle Degitis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Hector Valentin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Jacob Burg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Kelsey Berlin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.06
Taryn Smallwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Irina Suyumova
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Christine Hong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Andres Seijas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Nabeel Meghji
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.73
Janice Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
David Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nabeel Meghji + Taryn Smallwood5555% games+13.2% vs expected
Michelle Degitis + Nabeel Meghji11261% games+2.9% vs expected
Shawn Iben + Kelsey Berlin8454% games+1.6% vs expected
Janice Jensen + Andres Seijas3647% games−1.1% vs expected
David Tulloch + Kelsey Berlin4451% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Degitis + Shawn Iben123 matchesnot enough data
Janice Jensen + Nabeel Meghji213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shawn Iben
47W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Michelle Degitis
108W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Hector Valentin
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Jacob Burg
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
Kelsey Berlin
76W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Taryn Smallwood
109W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Irina Suyumova
97W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Christine Hong
37W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Andres Seijas
99W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Nabeel Meghji
86W–55L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
Janice Jensen
66W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Tulloch
28W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.