Teams

Barnes/Piedmont 18 2.5W Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-20vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTener Starling vs Clara Gonzalez Flores3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Meredith Vaughn6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Jenifer Checo4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Nakisha Boulware Watts6-1, 6-0
2025-07-17vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Erin Wallace3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesTener Starling vs Allison Chisholm6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Allyson Wood2-6, 1-6
2025-06-30vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesTener Starling vs Clara Gonzalez Flores0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Shumate vs Diana Angeles1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Shumate vs Noelle Budzyn1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Jessica Kopp3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Sydney Wittman0-6, 0-6
2025-06-11vs Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Erin Wallace7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTener Starling vs Diana Angeles2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Allyson Wood4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Noelle Budzyn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Shumate vs Jenifer Checo1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Jessica Kopp6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Meredith Lantz
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.41
Tener Starling
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.19
Janice Wuebker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.05
Lyndsey Grubb
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Michelle Shumate
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsey Grubb + Janice Wuebker0618% games−14.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Lantz
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Tener Starling
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.41
Janice Wuebker
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Lyndsey Grubb
4W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Michelle Shumate
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.