Teams

Schuster 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesGraceanne Schuster / Tia Opyd vs Kristin Gile / Tori Swanson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Brodeur / Jordan Creasy vs Jennifer Ayers / Jenna Petty2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Tessa Olinger vs Hunter Arnett / Barbara Michael6-3, 6-2
2026-08-24vs Barnes 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Tia Opyd vs Olivia Beane / Cameron Holcomb7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGraceanne Schuster / Megan Stanley vs Allison Sharpe / Lyndsey Grubb6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulia Brodeur / Carla Vilton vs Lorraine Rusch / Katie Tucker1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Tessa Olinger vs Ginger Ballard / Nicole Wurl6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Brodeur / Megan Stanley vs Jenifer Checo / Jennie Goforth1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Vilton / Zaira Arfeen vs Julie Mcgehee / Kathryn Roberts2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Julia Brodeur
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Suki Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Tessa Olinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Tia Opyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Jordan Creasy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Megan Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.89
Carla Vilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Graceanne Schuster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Zaira Arfeen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Brodeur
0W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Suki Gutierrez
32W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Tessa Olinger
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Tia Opyd
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Jordan Creasy
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Megan Stanley
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Carla Vilton
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Erica Jurney-Harrelson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Graceanne Schuster
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaira Arfeen
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.