Teams

Uhlenhake/Knoxville

2026 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 15 6:15 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 27 1:00 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Oct 4 1:00 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs Smead/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMonica Casey / Sarah Attkisson vs Melanie Johnson / Debbie Bryant3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Maggie Reynolds vs LOURDES BLANDINO / Joy Benson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Shrivalle / Darcy Hoffman vs Cindi Mooney / Marcia Bates6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Tammy Shrivalle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Yoko Umezawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jennifer Lea
published
3.15
Tracey Belmont
published
3.12
Michelle Uhlenhake
published
3.01
Elizabeth Justus
published
3.00
Jenne MacCagli
published
2.97
Monica Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Ginger Arthur
published
2.88
Tara Osborne-Martz
published
2.83
Linda Bui
published
2.65
Sarah Attkisson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Darcy Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenne MacCagli + Michelle Uhlenhake4839% games+1.7% vs expected
Ginger Arthur + Michelle Uhlenhake3448% gamesnot enough data
Tara Osborne-Martz + Ginger Arthur224 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Arthur + Linda Bui314 matchesnot enough data
Jenne MacCagli + Linda Bui134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Shrivalle
43W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Yoko Umezawa
9W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Lea
11W–25L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracey Belmont
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Uhlenhake
17W–31L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Justus
23W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Jenne MacCagli
7W–19L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Monica Casey
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Ginger Arthur
26W–21L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Tara Osborne-Martz
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Linda Bui
23W–24L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Sarah Attkisson
10W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Darcy Hoffman
16W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.