Teams

Morley, Jacobson/Schultheis

2026 55&Over Men · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-18vs Point Set, Hutchinson/DeTullioLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Schultheis / Michael Percent vs Bradley Satenspiel / Donald Mones4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Hahn / Charles Jacobson vs Mark Serper / Jeffrey Blankstein1-6, 5-7
2026-08-03vs Morley, MoramarcoLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Schultheis / Steve Rosenfeld vs Sean Maskell / Eric Zhu1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLloyd Gittler / John Wright vs Angelo de Bourg / Sung Kwon3-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs Kings Park, Consiglio/FentonLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Schultheis / Carlos Rios vs Neil Horner / Joshua Rogowsky7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Hahn / John Wright vs Raymond Lombardi / Richard Makover2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBlake Hanson / Alex Havriliak vs Timothy Consiglio / Tom DeMaio7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-30vs Syosset, AlrejaLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Schultheis / John Wright vs Raju Joshi / Ash Pahuja5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLloyd Gittler / Mitchell Rose vs Sachin Narvekar / Scott Waldman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Havriliak / Steve Rosenfeld vs Rajpal Chopra / Jiten Hirani6-2, 6-4
2026-06-24vs KP, MarklinLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Schultheis / Michael Percent vs Stephen Weiss / Andrew Bokar5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Rosenfeld / Blake Hanson vs Martin Chow / James Mattutat6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Jacobson / David Hahn vs William Carson / Paul Schneider3-6, 0-6
2026-06-16vs LIHR, KronenbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesLloyd Gittler / Steve Rosenfeld vs Robert Kronenberg / David Singer4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Hahn / Eric Schultheis vs Richard Nickeson / Frank Tufano3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Jacobson / John Labanca vs Robert Kelly / Joe Shimer0-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs Morley, MoramarcoWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Percent / Eric Schultheis vs Angelo de Bourg / Jemal Creary6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBlake Hanson / Charles Jacobson vs Darryl Blue / Todd Greenwald3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Labanca / Mitchell Rose vs Glen Chernick / Marc Zimmerman6-3, 6-4
2026-06-01vs Kings Park, Consiglio/FentonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Labanca / Mitchell Rose vs Richard Makover / John DeMartino1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Percent / Eric Schultheis vs Neil Horner / Douglas Johnston2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBlake Hanson / John Wright vs Martin Marmorale / Robert Savitsky6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mitchell Rose
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Carlos Rios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
David Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Blake Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bobby Brown
published 3.5
Homero Rios
published 3.5
3.18
Alex Havriliak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
John Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Eric Schultheis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Charles Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.84
Lloyd Gittler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Labanca
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Percent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steve Rosenfeld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Schultheis + Michael Percent4947% gamesnot enough data
Eric Schultheis + Steve Rosenfeld2334% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Rios + Homero Rios4153% gamesnot enough data
David Hahn + Blake Hanson0544% gamesnot enough data
Charles Jacobson + John Wright123 matchesnot enough data
Charles Jacobson + Bobby Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitchell Rose
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Carlos Rios
131W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
David Hahn
27W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Blake Hanson
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bobby Brown
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Homero Rios
17W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alex Havriliak
21W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
John Wright
61W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Eric Schultheis
11W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Charles Jacobson
43W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lloyd Gittler
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
John Labanca
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Percent
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Rosenfeld
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.