Teams

Team 7 Westwood Wolfpack

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-07-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan McWeeney / Bradley Vineyard vs Allison Collins / Larissa Kochetkova6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-23vs Team 3 Love & DeucesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Diaz / Bradley Vineyard vs Melissa Bruce / Ingrid Hunsicker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Lina Gong
published
3.18
Valerie Camillo
published
3.01
Jacqueline Diaz
published
2.96
Irene Shiu
published
2.94
Rachel Kim
published
2.89
Angelena Hirzel
published 3
2.87
Bradley Vineyard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Shari Brown
published
2.68
Katherine Virkstis
published
2.65
Barbara Timblin
published 3
2.52
Erin Fisher
published
2.49
Lynn Stattel
published
2.38
Gayle Balba
published
2.35
Mona Hans
published
2.32
Deanna Busteed
published 2.5
Susan McWeeney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Diaz + Bradley Vineyard3544% games−9.4% vs expected
Shari Brown + Rachel Kim224 matchesnot enough data
Shari Brown + Jacqueline Diaz123 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Balba + Mona Hans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lina Gong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Valerie Camillo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jacqueline Diaz
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Irene Shiu
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Rachel Kim
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Angelena Hirzel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Bradley Vineyard
22W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Shari Brown
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Katherine Virkstis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Barbara Timblin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65
Erin Fisher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lynn Stattel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Gayle Balba
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38
Mona Hans
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Deanna Busteed
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Susan McWeeney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.