Teams

OB - Green

2026 GS USTA Tri-level 55 & Over League · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-01vs GS - RushSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hughston / Lorna Manning vs Jill Kunkel / Terri Ammons1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Ragland / Susan Grant vs Kim Barnard / Mary Lattof6-3, 6-3
2026-06-11vs GS - RushWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Cleverdon / Angela Hunt vs Pam Klingbeil / Ann Gaylor6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Jordan / Patricia Hughston vs Tammy Rush / Marcy Costa7-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesLorna Manning / Jennifer McCurdy vs Kimberly Weed / Mary Lattof5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-04vs GS - RushLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrancis Samios / Mallory Jackson vs Ann Gaylor / Arlene Volnoff3-6, 3-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Greene / Pam Sparks vs Tammy Rush / Terri Ammons3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLorna Manning / Kathy Ragland vs Kimberly Weed / Shannon Spinks4-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs GS - RushLost 12
L#1 DoublesMallory Jackson / Patricia Scheffing vs Pam Klingbeil / Ann Gaylor1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hughston / Cheryl Jordan vs Jill Kunkel / Susan Carroll0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Grant / Jennifer McCurdy vs Traci Vittitow / Kim Barnard3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-21vs GS - RushLost 12
L#1 DoublesMallory Jackson / Angela Hunt vs Ann Gaylor / Laura Elliott6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichelle Greene / Pam Sparks vs Terri Ammons / Susan Carroll2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Grant / Kathy Ragland vs Kimberly Weed / Mary Lattof6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GS - Rush418715118
2OB - Green147820158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Mallory Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Francis Samios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Cynthia Cleverdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Angela Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Pam Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Cheryl Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Patricia Hughston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Kim Humphrey
published
3.14
Patricia Scheffing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Michelle Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Lorna Manning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Jennifer McCurdy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Kathy Ragland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Sparks + Michelle Greene7359% games+6.7% vs expected
Angela Hunt + Francis Samios5253% games+3.1% vs expected
Cheryl Jordan + Patricia Hughston61048% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Jackson
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Francis Samios
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cynthia Cleverdon
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Angela Hunt
59W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Pam Sparks
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cheryl Jordan
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Patricia Hughston
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kim Humphrey
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
Patricia Scheffing
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Greene
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lorna Manning
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jennifer McCurdy
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
Kathy Ragland
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.