Teams

NNM 3.0W Romero - VR

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-11-16vs NNM 3.0W Webster - EGLost 12
W#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Rachel Mosher vs Darlene Endy / Susan Webster3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSacha Bikhazi vs Carol Earp3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesVeronica Jimenez-Chavez / Kamie Buddenhagen vs Mary Sloane / Cynthia Graves5-7, 4-6
2024-11-10vs NNM 3.0W Morse - HPLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Russell / Chena Mesling vs CECILIA GORMAN / Cynthia King5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Mosher vs Jane Ferrizz6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Ryan / Veronica Jimenez-Chavez vs Susan Hedman / Trisa Ulrich5-7, 2-6
2024-10-27vs NNM 3.0W McLin - Alto ParkWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Diana Russell vs Wanda MacQueen / Eileen TYRRELL6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKamie Buddenhagen vs Lisa Harris6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Ryan / Pearl Lucero vs Andrea Cunningham / Heather Kim6-2, 6-1
2024-10-22vs NNM 3.0W Schloss - TCALost 13
W#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Rachel Mosher vs Kimberly Bell / Elizabeth Miller7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKamie Buddenhagen vs Monica Foster6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Russell / Chena Mesling vs Sue Stone / Kathryn Traub1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPearl Lucero / Lori Ryan vs Lee Sloan / Allysa Gambarella4-6, 2-6
2024-10-17vs NNM 3.0W Sanchez - TCAWon 40
W#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Holly Culberson vs Susie Oldfield / Anne Keleher6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKamie Buddenhagen vs Nicole Robertson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPearl Lucero / Lori Ryan vs Marcia Schick / Maureen Keleher Kelly2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Chena Mesling vs Tara Cok / Danielle Kuna6-2, 6-3
2024-10-14vs NNM 3.0W Morck - Lobo ClubLost 13
L#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Diana Russell vs Barbara Morck / Heather Seus6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Mosher vs Karoline Bota6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPearl Lucero / Kamie Buddenhagen vs Denise Alladi / Jennifer Dion6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChena Mesling / Jeannene Telck vs Donna Harnick / Shirley Wynn3-6, 1-6
2024-10-03vs NNM 3.0W Dunbar - HPSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Holly Culberson vs Jane Ryfun / Irene Sokolowski4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMiki Matsuo vs Aislinn Maestas6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPearl Lucero / Kamie Buddenhagen vs Ruth Chow / Catherine Porto6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Ryan / Veronica Jimenez-Chavez vs Jeannette Dunbar / Annie Hutton6-7, 3-6
2024-09-22vs NNM/Goodrum/Adult 40&Over/3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Kamie Buddenhagen vs Joyce Paulsen / Diana Filliman3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMiki Matsuo vs Jane Vicente4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeannene Telck / Chena Mesling vs Michelle Nowfel / Dawn Lorenz1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Ryan / Pearl Lucero vs Monica Young / Rebecca Pino1-6, 2-6
2024-09-14vs NNM 3.0W Poulin - TanoanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMiki Matsuo / Rachel Mosher vs Rena Highland / Crystal Wagner-McCombs6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVeronica Jimenez-Chavez / Jeannene Telck vs Stefanie Poulin / Kacie Svet3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKamie Buddenhagen / Diana Russell vs Julie Kelly-Smith / Laura Horton6-2, 6-3
2024-09-12vs NNM 3.0W Hasse - HPLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Culberson / Lori Ryan vs Rebecca Hasse / Andrea Westman2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Mosher vs Chelsea Collins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKamie Buddenhagen / Chena Mesling vs Kyra Miller / Lauren Douglas-Ricks2-6, 1-6
2024-09-07vs NNM 3.0W Bailey-Perea - TanoanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Holly Culberson vs Jennifer Hull / Mistie Smailer3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Ryan / Chena Mesling vs Carol Billingham / Kristi Bowen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Russell / Veronica Jimenez-Chavez vs Kami Bailey Perea / Suzan Tipton2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Goodrum/Adult 40&Over/3.0W11035924294
2NNM 3.0W Schloss - TCA9238616242
3NNM 3.0W Hasse - HP83271738332
4NNM 3.0W Dunbar - HP83261841363
5NNM 3.0W Webster - EG74251944381
6NNM 3.0W Poulin - Tanoan56202454403
7NNM 3.0W Bailey-Perea - Tanoan47202453397
8NNM 3.0W McLin - Alto Park47202455416
9NNM 3.0W Morck - Lobo Club47182659433
10NNM 3.0W Morse - HP3893571472
11NNM 3.0W Romero - VR29172762441
12NNM 3.0W Sanchez - TCA11093572466

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jerome Romero
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Miki Matsuo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Rachel Mosher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.74
Kamie Buddenhagen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.67
Holly Culberson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Veronica Jimenez-Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Pearl Lucero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Diana Russell
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.43
Sacha Bikhazi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Chena Mesling
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Jeannene Telck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Ryan + Pearl Lucero4644% games+9.9% vs expected
Holly Culberson + Rachel Mosher10550% games+7.4% vs expected
Diana Russell + Holly Culberson1445% games−3.7% vs expected
Holly Culberson + Pearl Lucero2345% games−5.5% vs expected
Pearl Lucero + Kamie Buddenhagen2543% games−10.2% vs expected
Diana Russell + Kamie Buddenhagen3256% gamesnot enough data
Sacha Bikhazi + Kamie Buddenhagen0522% gamesnot enough data
Diana Russell + Lori Ryan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerome Romero
143W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Miki Matsuo
80W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Rachel Mosher
80W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Kamie Buddenhagen
37W–43L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Holly Culberson
27W–34L career · 9 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Veronica Jimenez-Chavez
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Pearl Lucero
26W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Diana Russell
46W–71L career · 7 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Sacha Bikhazi
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Chena Mesling
10W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeannene Telck
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Ryan
21W–43L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.