Teams

Pillow/DV/Foothills

2025 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 40 & over · 4.0 Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoohillsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pillow / Jesse Miller vs Karen Tonks / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKendra Gould / Christopher Stone vs Dawn Owens / Ramsey Dellinger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-20vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Mandy Poplin vs Aaron Swisher / Jenette Swisher1-6, 5-7
2025-07-06vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoohillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Phillip Bruch vs Karen Tonks / Ramsey Dellinger6-4, 6-2
2025-06-22vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Ginn / Jennifer Pillow vs Jim Heisler / Jenette Swisher2-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs Tonks/Pebble Creek/FoohillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMandy Poplin / Jesse Miller vs Deirdre Bolter / George Bolter6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKendra Gould / Logan Freeman vs Charlotte Hartman / Ramsey Dellinger3-6, 5-7
2025-06-01vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhillip Bruch / Jennifer Pillow vs Aaron Steen / Amanda Berry - (DQ)6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Hadley Watson
published 4
3.80
Jennifer Pillow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Mandy Poplin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brett Summey
published 4
3.73
Mark Ginn
published
3.67
Phillip Bruch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kendra Gould
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kathleen Graham
published
3.57
Logan Freeman
published
3.41
Mitch Parry
published
Valerie Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Pillow + Phillip Bruch213 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Poplin + Phillip Bruch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hadley Watson
30W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jennifer Pillow
79W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Mandy Poplin
125W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Brett Summey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Ginn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Phillip Bruch
66W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Kendra Gould
51W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Kathleen Graham
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Logan Freeman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.57
Mitch Parry
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Valerie Craig
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.