Teams

DMICHAUD

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-21vs KLamb 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Shannon Fuller vs Jessie Brinkley / Julie Dougherty1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Nani / Diane Michaud vs Bethany Stempien / Jeannette Walker7-6, 6-4
2022-05-17vs JSolomonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Michaud / April Lyon vs Sharon McCloud / Beth Shelly6-2, 7-6
2022-05-10vs BRobinson 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Diane Michaud vs Susan Goodman / Michele Storr1-6, 5-7
2022-04-27vs JWoy 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Fuller / April Lyon vs Jennifer Woy / Lyn Stanley6-2, 6-3
2022-04-19vs SBreckenridgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Fuller / April Lyon vs Sheila Breckenridge / Debbie Castiller1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-29vs LElliott 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Rea / April Lyon vs Katie Maxwell / Griffin Lamb4-6, 2-6
2022-03-15vs MChristopherWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathryn Nani / Lisa McDermott vs Patricia Steele / Michele Rosenthal7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesApril Lyon / Beth Rea vs Meaghan Christopher / Kimberly Lamm6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Christy Sandy
published 3
2.83
Lisa McDermott
published
2.78
Aparna Vanguri
published 3
2.75
Melissa Cleary
published
2.74
Monica Gardner
published
2.71
Casey Rainey
published 3
2.65
April Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.59
Kathryn Nani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Jodi Haire
published 3
2.19
Angie McNeill
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Nani + Casey Rainey7549% games−1.5% vs expected
Christy Sandy + Casey Rainey6158% gamesnot enough data
Lisa McDermott + Monica Gardner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christy Sandy
42W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Lisa McDermott
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Aparna Vanguri
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Melissa Cleary
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Monica Gardner
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Casey Rainey
31W–36L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
April Lyon
118W–140L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Kathryn Nani
55W–93L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Jodi Haire
11W–26L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Angie McNeill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.