Teams

Evans, Karen

2026 HOA Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-17vs HOA/Blue-Billington/18&over3.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLexy Kelley / Carol Cramer vs Terah Buresh / Cyndi DeMaio3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Brady / Mary Hoffman vs Jennifer Halter / Sandy Shino3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Ma, JulieWon 31
L#1 DoublesMary Hoffman / Erin Hahn vs Reed Smith / Kate Watson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLexy Kelley vs Maiah O'Rourke4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHuijeong Kim / Alli Gerth vs Suzanne Doherty / Nell Collier6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaja Holmes / Leslie Smith vs Melanie Sharpnack / Jenny Betz7-6, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Lexy Kelley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Carol Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Mary Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Erin Hahn
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Nancy Brady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Maja Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Deborah Friesen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Alli Gerth
usually #1 Doubles 90%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.76
Huijeong Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Allen
published 3
2.67
Paulette Schwerdt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Evans
published
Patricia Noonan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Brady + Mary Hoffman2547% games+5.6% vs expected
Deborah Friesen + Paulette Schwerdt224 matchesnot enough data
Paulette Schwerdt + Alli Gerth224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hoffman + Lexy Kelley224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Friesen + Carol Cramer213 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Friesen + Alli Gerth303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lexy Kelley
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Carol Cramer
49W–40L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Mary Hoffman
34W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Erin Hahn
9W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Nancy Brady
53W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Maja Holmes
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Deborah Friesen
34W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Alli Gerth
21W–24L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Huijeong Kim
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Anna Allen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulette Schwerdt
24W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Karen Evans
26W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Noonan
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.