Teams

Boar's Head Players-MacGovern

2024 Charlottesville Adult 55 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Amy Taggart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesBelinda Blankenship / Marcy MacGovern vs Diana Ferguson / Kathleen Long6-3, 6-4
2024-05-24vs Glenmore-LongSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Taggart / Cathie Ricketts vs Kathleen Long / Diana Ferguson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Catherine Haney / Susan Liebenow6-2, 6-1
2024-05-10vs ACAC Ely/BaileyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBelinda Blankenship / Ellen Hayes vs Judith Ely / Debbie Shpigler6-1, 6-0
2024-05-03vs Glenmore-LongLost 01
L#2 DoublesMerrily Main D'Arpino / Laura Leetzow vs Christine Dean / Patti Rowe6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-19vs ACAC Ely/BaileyWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Leetzow / Belinda Blankenship vs Judith Ely / Jan Carroll7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGrace Bartini / Merrily Main D'Arpino vs Elizabeth Gunnels / Deborah Smith6-3, 6-4
2024-04-12vs Glenmore-LongWon 20
W#1 DoublesBelinda Blankenship / Ellen Hayes vs Judith Divita / Sallee Bowser7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Taggart / Cathie Ricketts vs Christine Dean / Gina Dubuisson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Laura Leetzow
published
3.22
Belinda Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Merrily Main D'Arpino
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Cathie Ricketts
published 3.5
2.74
Grace Bartini
published 3
Marcy MacGovern
published
Michele Rowan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merrily Main D'Arpino + Amy Taggart11755% games−2.7% vs expected
Belinda Blankenship + Amy Taggart5161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Leetzow
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Belinda Blankenship
81W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Merrily Main D'Arpino
151W–107L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Cathie Ricketts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Grace Bartini
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Marcy MacGovern
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Rowan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.