Teams

MO/Edwards/55&Over8.0MXD

55 & Over Mixed Section Invitational · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO/Edwards/55&Over8.0MXD000000
2OK-REG/Anne Wood/Mixed 55&over8.0X000000
3STL-REG/Shouldis/8.0MXD000000
4HOA: Strader000000
5NE-REG/Blumel/55&Over8.0MXD000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Pam McAllister
published
3.52
Tina Gibson
published
3.49
Karen Thies
published
3.40
April Edwards
published 3.5
3.31
Beverly Horvit
published 4
Brock Jones
published 3.5
3.25
Laurie Everett
published
Andy McGowan
published
Kamlendra Singh
published
Kevin Everett
published
Randy Picht
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Everett + Laurie Everett12953% gamesnot enough data
April Edwards + Kamlendra Singh2634% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Horvit + Randy Picht3242% gamesnot enough data
Andy McGowan + April Edwards224 matchesnot enough data
Pam McAllister + Kamlendra Singh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam McAllister
36W–23L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Tina Gibson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Karen Thies
9W–26L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
April Edwards
36W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
4
Beverly Horvit
46W–58L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Brock Jones
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Everett
47W–49L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Andy McGowan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kamlendra Singh
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Everett
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Picht
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.