Teams

TLTC Nadayag

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Men

1 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Chan Han
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Results12 ties
2019-03-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesChan Han vs Aaron Coe6-4, 6-3
2019-03-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesChan Han vs Brian Mitchell6-2, 6-2
2019-03-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesChan Han vs Kyle Moore6-2, 6-0
2019-02-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesChan Han vs Ken Benoit6-1, 6-3
2019-01-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesChan Han vs Rohit Sharma6-4, 7-6
2019-01-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesChan Han / Chusak Saetee vs Stephen Romano / Rob Green6-1, 6-0
2019-01-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesChan Han / Chusak Saetee vs Bill Rumpf / Kevin Kelley6-1, 6-2
2018-11-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesChan Han / Chusak Saetee vs Gerald Nelson / Drake Nicholson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2018-10-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesChan Han / Chusak Saetee vs Cullen Stephenson / Dustin Stroh6-2, 6-2
2018-10-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Chaves / Chan Han vs Dave McDonald / Stefan Green6-1, 6-3
2018-09-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesTodd Lash / Chan Han vs Jorge Adamicska / Leonard Bauer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2018-09-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChan Han / Greg Carter vs Bruce Dayton / Andy Richardson6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Chan Han
146W–82L career
4%96%1%
4.13

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.