Teams

LAndersen (Chestnut Square)

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Lydia Schoeck vs Doris Rahman / Kristine Predmore6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeri Snoke / Iveth Major vs Silvia Engel / Caroline Lapointe3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-26vs PNussman (Providence Plantation)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Lydia Schoeck vs Karen Fisher / Kathleen Johnstone6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngela Benson / Iveth Major vs Phyllis Nussman / Colette Wilkes6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Richardson / Teri Snoke vs Laurie Hoots / Marie Schulz3-6, 3-6
2026-08-24vs RDrees/RO'Rourke (Blakeney)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Stephanie Gossert vs Laurie Canata / Cynthia Spera2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Benson / Teri Snoke vs Mary Shea / Dorothy Garrity0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Jones / Claudia Ridley vs Katy Hart / Holly Pasut6-7, 3-6
2026-08-17vs ASykes (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Teresa Richardson vs Deborah Toomey / Shelley Brunker5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Iliana Bleau vs Elizabeth Smart / Anne Sykes5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Additon / Becky Shopf vs Carolyn Butler / Susan McGarry6-2, 6-4
2026-08-10vs JGieker/LPacello (Lifetime)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky Shopf / Susan Additon vs Jennifer Haahs / Stacey Reinhardt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTeri Snoke / Iveth Major vs Trista Holwager / Lisa Pacello4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Jones / Iliana Bleau vs Kelly Ellis / Julie Gieker2-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs PNussman (Providence Plantation)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Shopf / Marianne Keaton vs Michelle Jegier / Marie Schulz6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIliana Bleau / Suzanne Jones vs Carol Davis / Laurie Hoots6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Snoke / Iveth Major vs Phyllis Nussman / Joan Bullard6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JGieker/LPacello (Lifetime)3081357
2RDrees/RO'Rourke (Blakeney)3081467
3LChriscoe/PGolding (Southampton)3081553
4SPierle (Weddington)2042552
5JCarnahan (Palisades)2163774
6LAndersen (Chestnut Square)21451183
7YGama/Davidson (WSRC)21451179
8JLocke/MMcKinstry (Raintree)1124853
9LRosser/MHabegger (Weddington Chase)12271487
10PDonoghue (Matthews)0112433
11LSelland (Sardis)0112534
12MShuford (OPRC)02151165
13MGlover (OPRC)03361285
14ASykes (OPRC)03361289
15PNussman (Providence Plantation)032715100

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Angela Benson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.59
Marianne Keaton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Teresa Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Becky Shopf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Gossert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Teri Snoke
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Iveth Major
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Iliana Bleau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Susan Additon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kate Merrill
published
3.09
Suzanne Jones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Claudia Ridley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Jones + Teresa Richardson5161% games+9.2% vs expected
Marianne Keaton + Lydia Schoeck311659% games+4.2% vs expected
Becky Shopf + Teri Snoke5641% games−1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Gossert + Becky Shopf4349% games−4.6% vs expected
Stephanie Gossert + Teri Snoke14952% games−7.5% vs expected
Susan Additon + Claudia Ridley3255% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Richardson + Teri Snoke3251% gamesnot enough data
Kate Merrill + Suzanne Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Benson
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Marianne Keaton
57W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Teresa Richardson
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Becky Shopf
96W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Stephanie Gossert
132W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Teri Snoke
90W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Iveth Major
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Iliana Bleau
109W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Susan Additon
65W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Kate Merrill
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Suzanne Jones
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Claudia Ridley
89W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.