Teams

TOC.Swain

2022 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 & Over 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-25vs PW.BologaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Healey / Jessica Revels vs Susan Ramirez / Heather Hastings0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShylaja Karimanye / Sue Mooney vs Rakhi Kreymerman / Emily Haverstick1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-14vs CAS.KuczynskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Goodman / Jessica Revels vs Dell Pinkston / Victoria Whetzel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Healey / Shylaja Karimanye vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebekah Swain / Sue Mooney vs Katrina KUCZYNSKI / Lissy Wood4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-11vs MD.OldhamWon 10
W#3 DoublesShylaja Karimanye / Heather Sasser vs Katie Klingemann / Jaclyn Englert6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShylaja Karimanye / Heather Sasser vs Alix Miller / Amy Condon4-6, 0-6
2022-06-18vs TOC.TandradinataLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Revels / Kathleen Healey vs Miho Ogura / Connie Kim1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Grimm / Robin Rhaney vs Megan Johnson / Caroline Graff7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-15vs TOC.TerjesenLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobin Rhaney / Jessica Revels vs Andrea Desonglo / Rita Burgess1-6, 2-6
2022-06-06Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Goodman / Jessica Revels vs Stefania Spetetchi / Suzanne Richards0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Reynolds / Robin Rhaney vs Kay Jackson / Lisa Marshall1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Jessica Revels
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Lisa Goodman
published
2.75
Shylaja Karimanye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Anne Grimm
published 3
2.17
Sue Mooney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Robin Rhaney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Rebekah Swain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Mooney + Shylaja Karimanye033 matchesnot enough data
Shylaja Karimanye + Robin Rhaney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jessica Revels
59W–77L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Lisa Goodman
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Shylaja Karimanye
111W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anne Grimm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Sue Mooney
52W–67L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Robin Rhaney
35W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Rebekah Swain
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.