Teams

RRTC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs PRC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Samantha Downing vs Amy Quinette / Allison Stewart6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Paschal vs Angela D'Alessandro0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Ramirez / Polly Klaus vs Crystal Hostelley / Donna Chan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Jennifer Bell vs Henriette Nash / Elizabeth Anderson6-1, 6-3
2026-07-09vs PRC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Behm / Sarah Turner vs Sheila Curry / Heather Beasley6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRachel Pollock vs Diana Guardian4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Downing / Sarah Latham vs Carol Lugo / Lisa Franklin6-1, 6-3
2026-07-02vs PCC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesSarah Latham / Sarah Turner vs Kim Vaughan / Rebecca Coakley6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Paschal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Behm / Jonna Mulqueen vs Shannon Lakes / LeAnne Wukovits6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Ramirez / Kimberly Parks vs Cait Dutcher / Nicole Benton5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-25vs SS-LT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha Downing / Sarah Turner vs Kristi Mathieson / Lois Green6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Pollock vs Ellen Thompson1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLauren Behm / Polly Klaus vs Jennifer Cree / Samantha Kirschke6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Kimberly Parks vs Carin Buster / Misato Zueger6-3, 6-1
2026-06-18vs CPV BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bell / Sarah Turner vs Jami Keenan / Debbie Conner1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Behm vs Liz Bauer6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarah Latham / Samantha Downing vs Julie Fujita / Deb Jensen6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Parks / Maureen Breitenbach vs Anthea Gerberg / Carol Lail6-3, 7-6
2026-06-11vs PCRK BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesLauren Behm / Jennifer Bell vs Debra Kuebler / Kellie Shurtz6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJanice Ramirez vs Patricia Shaw6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Turner / Jonna Mulqueen vs Cathy Shahan / Stacey Gilmore6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaureen Breitenbach / Polly Klaus vs Stacy Cieraszynski / Marion Metzbower7-5, 6-2
2026-06-04vs VCC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Behm / Sarah Turner vs Carleen Himel / Ashley Franklin6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bell / Sarah Latham vs Deborah Grillo / Teresa Hymowitz6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSamantha Downing / Kimberly Parks vs Marnie Brockamp / Diane Kelly6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Lauren Behm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Sarah Latham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Polly Klaus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Sarah Turner
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.37
Jonna Mulqueen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Samantha Downing
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Janice Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Rachel Pollock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Maureen Breitenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Amanda Paschal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Bell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Ramirez + Lauren Behm5079% games+15.1% vs expected
Jonna Mulqueen + Sarah Turner6165% games+6.8% vs expected
Lauren Behm + Sarah Turner7063% games+5.0% vs expected
Maureen Breitenbach + Samantha Downing4152% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Downing + Sarah Turner404 matchesnot enough data
Janice Ramirez + Sarah Turner404 matchesnot enough data
Jonna Mulqueen + Lauren Behm404 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Breitenbach + Polly Klaus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Behm
109W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Sarah Latham
68W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Polly Klaus
53W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Sarah Turner
52W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Jonna Mulqueen
106W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Samantha Downing
22W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Janice Ramirez
40W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Rachel Pollock
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Maureen Breitenbach
80W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Amanda Paschal
1W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Bell
27W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.