Teams

Sanlando-Crane-Kick Ace

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE TriLevel 18 & Over-DAY · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Zalloum / Sarah Knorst vs Maria Alfonzo / Isabella Marcano2-6, 6-7
2024-08-02vs Lake Cane-WuWon 10
W#2 DoublesYardise Jones / Sarah Knorst vs Ngan Hoang / Lisa Wu6-2, 6-2
2024-07-08vs Isleworth-AtaWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Knorst / Yardise Jones vs Jill Ata / Shawna Tree6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Kelli Forgione
published 4
3.49
Pamela Bravo
published
3.46
Kathy Myers
published
3.39
Julie Zalloum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Yardise Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Crane
published
3.26
Cynthia Rawlins
published 3.5
3.21
Jaqueline Pelliccia
published 3.5
3.20
Mandy Burr
published
2.96
Jenna Johns
published
Amy Seelman
published 3
2.66
Jennifer Gihon
published
Sarah Knorst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenna Johns + Mandy Burr5165% games+2.1% vs expected
Jaqueline Pelliccia + Julie Zalloum5258% gamesnot enough data
Julie Zalloum + Kelli Forgione4353% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Forgione + Yardise Jones5160% gamesnot enough data
Jaqueline Pelliccia + Yardise Jones3254% gamesnot enough data
Karen Crane + Kelli Forgione2341% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Gihon + Jenna Johns3254% gamesnot enough data
Jaqueline Pelliccia + Pamela Bravo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelli Forgione
237W–104L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Pamela Bravo
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Kathy Myers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
3.5
Julie Zalloum
83W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Yardise Jones
142W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Karen Crane
24W–34L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Rawlins
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Jaqueline Pelliccia
67W–53L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Mandy Burr
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.20
Jenna Johns
24W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Amy Seelman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Gihon
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Sarah Knorst
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.