Teams

CTL40/Ponton/WRC

Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
LIZA GREGORY
published
Amanda Henry
published 3.5
Christina Phillips
published 3.5
3.24
Margaret Price
published
3.17
Sandy Lybrand
published
3.14
Priscilla McCormick
published
3.12
Haideline Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Rhonda Griffin
published
2.78
Teresa Kitowicz
published
Deborah Anderson
published 3
2.65
Marla Durig
published
2.61
Pamela Feuerstein
published
Janice Allen
published
Kathy Ponton
published
Lessie Hammonds
published
Linda Wolter
published
Teresa Campbell
published
Teresa Ziegler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haideline Sosa + Linda Wolter7072% games+14.6% vs expected
Margaret Price + Haideline Sosa6176% games+14.3% vs expected
Christina Phillips + LIZA GREGORY4160% games+13.3% vs expected
Kathy Ponton + Pamela Feuerstein4549% games+12.3% vs expected
Amanda Henry + Haideline Sosa11071% games+11.1% vs expected
Teresa Ziegler + Haideline Sosa581467% games+6.6% vs expected
Janice Allen + Haideline Sosa12462% games+6.3% vs expected
Teresa Kitowicz + Teresa Campbell5358% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LIZA GREGORY
106W–75L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Amanda Henry
52W–72L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christina Phillips
30W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Price
114W–90L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Sandy Lybrand
96W–80L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
Priscilla McCormick
46W–65L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Haideline Sosa
186W–75L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
Rhonda Griffin
28W–42L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Teresa Kitowicz
52W–94L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Deborah Anderson
28W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marla Durig
63W–64L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Pamela Feuerstein
45W–39L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Janice Allen
65W–63L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Ponton
86W–61L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lessie Hammonds
39W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Wolter
35W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Campbell
61W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Ziegler
104W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.