Teams

SD 4.0WD La Jolla TC/ Bourne

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-12vs SD 4.0WD Barnes TC/ WimmerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLUISA BAKAY / Julia Scher vs Monika Wimmer / Anastasia Duboshina6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Dana Thompson vs Nadine Utz / Roanne Manzano-Roth1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Golemb / Janene Christopher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-05vs SD 4.0WD Coronado TC/ HammondWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Bourne / Kelsey Mueller vs Elsie Hammond / Tugce Varol6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-29vs SD 4.0WD SDTRC/ HansonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Blackburn / Michelle Chew vs Yvonne Angyal / Carol Diggs0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Maria Ward vs Amy Hamric / Jennie Blacker6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Holnback / Janene Christopher vs Elizabeth Yu-Hansen / Sandra Angel6-2, 6-1
2025-10-08vs SD 4.0WD SDTRC/ KaufmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLUISA BAKAY / Dana Thompson vs Adelle Danson / Soledad Ramirez7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Julia Scher vs Sandy Dielman / Noelle Randall2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJanene Christopher / Kelsey Mueller vs Carrie Musicant / Kelly Wilson7-5, 6-4
2025-10-01vs SD 4.0WD Balboa TC/ DavisWon 20
W#1 DoublesLUISA BAKAY / Deborah Fitzgerald vs Becky Yzaguirre / ANGIE CRAWFORD6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Kuba / Julia Scher vs Susan Davis / Tenley Gritts6-3, 6-2
2025-09-24vs SD 4.0WD Barnes TC/ BuckyWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamantha Polikowski / Kelsey Mueller vs Lisa Garland / Michall Saccuzzo4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLUISA BAKAY / Terri Bourne vs Amanda Barnard / Michelle Strachan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Kuba / Julia Scher vs Helen Farr / Nichole Dolinsky4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-17vs SD 4.0WD Coronado TC/ WebsterLost 02
L#1 DoublesLUISA BAKAY / Deborah Fitzgerald vs Wanda Jurlina / Cristina Rassvetaieff5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Anne Blackburn vs Katerina Hart / Jessica Cunningham3-6, 5-7
2025-09-10vs SD 4.0WD Barnes TC/ CaringalLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Bourne / Christine Golemb vs Lucy Chard / Adriana Haskal4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Chew / Samantha Polikowski vs Angela Hart / Kathy Williams2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Fitzgerald / Diane Holnback vs Maria Pourteymour / Robin Seay4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
LUISA BAKAY
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.97
Julia Scher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.93
Anne Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Terri Bourne
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.75
Samantha Polikowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Christine Golemb
published 4
3.69
Deborah Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Michelle Chew
published
3.64
Maria Ward
published
3.60
Becky Kuba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Janene Christopher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Diane Holnback
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Blackburn + LUISA BAKAY6168% games+7.3% vs expected
LUISA BAKAY + Julia Scher27858% games+6.8% vs expected
LUISA BAKAY + Deborah Fitzgerald41042% games−0.3% vs expected
Becky Kuba + Diane Holnback121349% games−0.7% vs expected
Anne Blackburn + Terri Bourne7458% games−1.3% vs expected
Diane Holnback + Deborah Fitzgerald5947% games−2.4% vs expected
Deborah Fitzgerald + Terri Bourne31044% games−5.8% vs expected
Janene Christopher + Deborah Fitzgerald4749% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
LUISA BAKAY
86W–63L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Julia Scher
72W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Anne Blackburn
92W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Terri Bourne
105W–136L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Samantha Polikowski
40W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Christine Golemb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Deborah Fitzgerald
178W–201L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Michelle Chew
62W–33L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
Maria Ward
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Becky Kuba
178W–141L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Janene Christopher
97W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Diane Holnback
97W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.