Teams

SH BLUE

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-13vs CCV GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesHolly Strandes vs Eliza Wells1-6, 5-7
2021-08-30vs CACI BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesSeon Comeau / Gwen Kleinert vs Beth Zubowicz / Bernadette Rottschafer1-6, 1-6
2021-08-23vs PCRK BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Strandes / Natalie Messersmith vs Tina Book / Juli Reiakvam7-5
L#2 DoublesAllyson Ross / Deborah Hughes vs Christine Maggio / Cindy Garrett6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2021-08-16vs CPV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllyson Ross / Seon Comeau vs Stacia Novak / Elizabeth Zeller6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Strandes vs Alison Barbaro5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNatalie Messersmith / Deborah Hughes vs Cortni Ward / Mary Lostak6-2, 6-4
2021-08-09vs PRKR REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly Strandes / Gwen Kleinert vs Rudi Fields / Virginia Hinds3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Messersmith / Deborah Hughes vs Georgina Swales / Jennifer Benson2-6, 5-7
2021-08-02vs PRC BLUELost 02
L#1 SinglesHolly Strandes vs Laura Jones2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Hughes / Allyson Ross vs Sherri Bliss / Kelly Glenn3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Holly Strandes
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Allyson Ross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Deborah Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gwen Kleinert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Scott
published
Natalie Messersmith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Seon Comeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Ross + Seon Comeau71545% games−2.7% vs expected
Deborah Hughes + Natalie Messersmith134 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Hughes + Allyson Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Strandes
48W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Allyson Ross
13W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Deborah Hughes
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gwen Kleinert
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Scott
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Messersmith
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Seon Comeau
9W–23L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.