Teams

MLong-CCC

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-27vs DBaker-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesDallas Knight / Jennifer Ogle vs Leslie Jackson / Laura Webb-Murrah6-1, 7-6
2025-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Elder / Dallas Knight vs Jesse Banks / Hayley Blum6-4, 6-1
2025-07-13vs LKulp-SVCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnna Fadel / Taylor Montague vs Dawn Kleinman / Lauren Kulp6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLauren Long / Allison Oshea vs Elizabeth Arnold / Laura Malahias3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-07-06vs LKulp2-BPWon 10
W#1 DoublesDallas Knight / Katie Elder vs Madeline Bowers / Meghan Blake6-0, 6-0
2025-06-29vs LBible-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Chin / Katie Elder vs Lora Alkhawam / Lindsay Mize4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Taylor Montague vs Laura Dubois / Ragini Singh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-22vs LBaxter-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Taylor Montague vs Bonni Baird / Ai-Jiuan Wu0-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs LGotwals-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Chin / Beth Clark vs Maggie Fritz-Morkin / Michelle Koeneke6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Fadel / Taylor Montague vs Lissa Gotwals / Barbie McGarrah6-3, 6-2
2025-06-01vs TDavies-CHCCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Taylor Montague vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Long / Allison Oshea vs Julie Myers / Karrie Tilley1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Katie Elder
published
3.56
Dallas Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Anna Fadel
published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Ogle
published
3.12
Tammy Chin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Taylor Montague
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.42
Allison Oshea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Jennifer Edmunds
published
1.65
Megan Pruette
published
Liz Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Ogle + Tammy Chin314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Chin + Dallas Knight224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Elder
36W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Dallas Knight
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Anna Fadel
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Jennifer Ogle
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Tammy Chin
85W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Taylor Montague
31W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
2.5
Allison Oshea
35W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Jennifer Edmunds
9W–27L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Megan Pruette
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.65
Liz Morris
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.