Teams

ACAC-Krebs

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-30vs CSW-GeorgeWon 30
W#1 DoublesReginald Tabor / Rebecca Wong vs Doug Blouch / Alice Ulrichs6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrittany Krebs / Anant Singh vs Steven Edlavitch / Betsy Siewers6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Ed Shropshire vs Barry George / Carolyn Moncure3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-23vs ACAC-Mixed Up JonesieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Ed Shropshire vs Daryl Jones / Shari Litow3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Mulligan vs K C Funk / Lisa Aaron6-0, 6-1
2024-03-16vs ACAC-Lewis / PfeifferSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRebecca Wong / Scott Oakley vs Alex Balas / Martinique Kandl6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJeanette Kim / Ed Shropshire vs Doug Okay / Amy McGlynn6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-09vs SAL-LaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Jeanette Kim vs Scott Gordon / Lauren Cecil5-7, 3-6
2024-03-02vs Westwood-Warfield Love HurtsWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Reginald Tabor vs Robert Nilson / Erin Gardner6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Mulligan / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Mark Wickersham / Louise O'Connor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs Raintree-GromlingWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Elizabeth Coleman vs Rahul Khisti / Cam Nguyen5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesScott Oakley / Jeanette Kim vs Slava Sery / Shazia Begin7-5, 4-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Mulligan / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Jay Harter / Ashley Gromling6-1, 7-6
2024-02-17vs Westwood-Seredni Tennis The MenaceLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Wong / Scott Oakley vs Peyton Bowman / Elizabeth Diller6-7, 6-7
2024-02-10vs ACAC-Romero/DickensLost 12
L#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Erika Anderson vs John Delisio / Barbara Kasten3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Mulligan / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Ariana Dickens / Glenn Pfluger6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Ed Shropshire vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-04vs MAC-Resurgence 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Oakley / Rebecca Wong vs Lynette Villadelgado / Matthew Morris2-6, 6-7
2024-01-27vs SAL-Booberg-Shaffer MixedLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Reginald Tabor vs Allison Krumpe / Joseph Andy Gilbert3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Wong / Craig Gittelman vs Ashley Raphael / Connor Buzzeo4-6, 2-6
2024-01-13vs HCC-Hardesty ManginLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeanette Kim / Scott Oakley vs Lisa Frazier / Scott Frazier6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErika Anderson / Bert Teachey vs Kimberly Ross / Benjamin Andrews5-7, 3-6
2024-01-06vs ACAC-Wilson's Sloppy JoesLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrittany Krebs / Anant Singh vs Lori Strobl / Jason Ruth3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
David Knudson
published 4
3.73
Bert Teachey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Grace Kim
published
3.36
John Mulligan
published
3.36
Reginald Tabor
published
3.35
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.28
Brittany Krebs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Craig Gittelman
published 3.5
Jeanette Kim
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.22
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Ed Shropshire
published
3.02
Rebecca Wong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.67
Teresa McClellan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Aeinan Kang + Bert Teachey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Knudson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Bert Teachey
119W–143L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–166L career · 9 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
Grace Kim
22W–26L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
John Mulligan
23W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Reginald Tabor
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Anant Singh
32W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brittany Krebs
99W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Craig Gittelman
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
171W–119L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Ed Shropshire
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Rebecca Wong
89W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Teresa McClellan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.