Teams

HCC Lerner

2025 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-30vs Alachua/GerlingLost 01
L#2 DoublesCara Duffaut / Mary Hazan vs Kristin O'Connor / Mary Butterworth2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-21vs WS TomasiLost 01
L#2 DoublesCara Duffaut / Elise Rodriguez vs Jennifer Bogle / Natasha Seavers3-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs 300 WimsettSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Redfern / Katie Hambrook vs Nicole Paradise Black / Julie Redding2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCara Duffaut / Mary Hazan vs Jhanna Gilbert / Megan Jansen0-6, 5-7
2025-11-08vs 300 WimsettLost 01
L#1 DoublesCara Duffaut / Mary Hazan vs Cameron Rosenthal / Kirsty Freshwater3-6, 3-6
2025-11-07vs Alachua/GerlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesCara Duffaut / Ryan Harmon vs Jazmyn Broxton / Della Tuten0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChiara de Gennaro / Karyn Governale vs Tina Toghiyani / Alison Safir5-7, 3-6
2025-11-02vs Alachua/GerlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesCara Duffaut / Elise Rodriguez vs Valerie Atohi / Laura Isaacs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs WS TomasiWon 20
W#1 DoublesChiara de Gennaro / Stella Roark vs Rebecca Long / Emilee Cato7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Hambrook / Ann Redfern vs Jennifer Bogle / Crystal Dix7-6, 6-2
2025-10-28vs 300 WimsettLost 02
L#1 DoublesCara Duffaut / Sheena Jones vs Ashley Fieldman / Ashley Chalouhi0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Nash / Chiara de Gennaro vs Sarah Hooghuis / Danielle Jake-schoffman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs WS TomasiWon 10
W#1 DoublesCara Duffaut / Katie Hambrook vs Rebecca Long / Crystal Dix7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Lauren Holliday
published
3.01
Chiara de Gennaro
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.97
Cassie Johnson
published 3
2.92
Ann Redfern
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Renee Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Stephanie Tangeman
published
Bailey Lerner
published 3
2.59
Lisa Weston
published
2.56
Kelly Nash
published
2.48
Cara Duffaut
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.35
Stella Roark
published
2.33
Karyn Governale
published
2.30
Mary Hazan
published
2.27
Sheena Jones
published
2.21
Elise Rodriguez
published
2.15
Majken Hoh
published
Elizabeth Laconi
published
Ryan Harmon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Redfern + Chiara de Gennaro314 matchesnot enough data
Sheena Jones + Mary Hazan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Holliday
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.14
3
Chiara de Gennaro
59W–37L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Cassie Johnson
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ann Redfern
39W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Renee Holmes
12W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Stephanie Tangeman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Bailey Lerner
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Weston
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Kelly Nash
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Cara Duffaut
79W–143L career · 11 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Stella Roark
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Karyn Governale
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Mary Hazan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Sheena Jones
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Elise Rodriguez
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Majken Hoh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Elizabeth Laconi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Harmon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.