Teams

Uhlenhake/Knoxville

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 55 & over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-09vs Vaughan/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jennifer Lea vs Carol Seamons / Tiffany Webb2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracey Belmont / Linda Roback vs Michelle Farley / Shirley Vaughan5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Warrick / CHARLIE TONKIN vs Vallie Collins / Susan Bishofberger3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Houck/Knoxville/55-3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Casey / Yoko Umezawa vs Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez / Donna French6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTracey Belmont / Laura Warrick vs Donna Worrell / Carol Irick6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenne MacCagli / Michelle Uhlenhake vs Debi Houck / Tammy Shrivalle2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-19vs Wentz/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Bui / Sandy Garrard vs Nancy Wentz / Deborah Szwarc6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Warrick / Linda Roback vs Angie Herzog / Eileen Webster4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jennifer Lea vs Jennifer Hensley / Helen Ericson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-18vs Dail/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Jenne MacCagli vs Jill Hoschette / Kelly Carillon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Casey / Ginger Arthur vs Jennifer Sharp / Kathy Wuethrich4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Bui / Sandy Garrard vs Barbara McCarty / Gina Grubbs6-4, 6-1
2026-03-28vs Yoder/Smith/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Warrick / CHARLIE TONKIN vs Angie Goodwyn / Wendi Arnold6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Roback / Tracey Belmont vs Shelly Krummen / Karen Watson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Patsy Fischer vs Kelly Hollingsworth / Kimberly Nelson6-7, 3-6
2026-03-21vs SMEAD/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCHARLIE TONKIN / Tracey Belmont vs Kathy Joy / Belinda Gambuzza6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatsy Fischer / Yoko Umezawa vs Angela Cutshall / Barbara Woods7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jenne MacCagli vs Vicky Robinson / Joy Benson7-6, 6-1
2026-03-14vs Campbell/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesYoko Umezawa / Jennifer Lea vs Jodie Campbell / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Warrick / Patsy Fischer vs Kimberly Morris / Lori Barrett6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jenne MacCagli vs Jennifer Collins / Pamela Shirley4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 55 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
CHARLIE TONKIN
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Warrick
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.24
Linda Roback
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Yoko Umezawa
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Jennifer Lea
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Tracey Belmont
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Michelle Uhlenhake
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.06
Patsy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Jenne MacCagli
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Monica Casey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Sandy Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Ginger Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tara Osborne-Martz
published
2.83
Linda Bui
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenne MacCagli + Michelle Uhlenhake4839% games+1.7% vs expected
Linda Bui + Sandy Garrard2348% games−2.1% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Linda Roback11752% games−3.6% vs expected
Ginger Arthur + Michelle Uhlenhake3448% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Belmont + Linda Roback3253% gamesnot enough data
Laura Warrick + Tracey Belmont134 matchesnot enough data
Tara Osborne-Martz + Ginger Arthur224 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Arthur + Linda Bui314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CHARLIE TONKIN
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Laura Warrick
32W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Linda Roback
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Yoko Umezawa
9W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Lea
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracey Belmont
15W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Uhlenhake
17W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Patsy Fischer
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jenne MacCagli
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Monica Casey
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sandy Garrard
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Ginger Arthur
26W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Tara Osborne-Martz
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Linda Bui
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.