Teams

Escambia - RS/Bradford

2021 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-07vs Gandy - SHLWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Charlotte Stark vs Heather Doerr / Kris Pritchard6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDawn Marino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Stewart / Jena Wise vs Jackie Barclay / Amelia Gandy7-5, 6-4
2021-06-30vs McCall - RS ClayLost 03
L#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Mandy Blair vs Tami McGhee / Shellie McCall3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDawn Marino vs Marina Agadzi1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesArlene Doyle / Diana Waters vs Darlene Warner / Debbie Cook6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs Gandy - SHLWon 20
W#2 DoublesArlene Doyle / Renee Bradford vs Edith Brodie / Jennifer Hawkins3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDawn Marino vs Lee Ann Pugh6-4, 6-4
2021-06-16vs Rhone - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Whitney Sumrall vs Leigh Clark / Erin Rhone6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArlene Doyle / Diana Waters vs Kristyn Miller / Chelsea Simpson6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJena Wise / Carly Russell vs Tammy Timby / Tonna Wheat0-6, 4-6
2021-06-09vs Rhone - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Waters / Arlene Doyle vs Deborah Cupp / Chelsea Simpson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJena Wise / Carly Russell vs Leigh Clark / Adele Dorian1-6, 2-6
2021-05-26vs McCall - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesArlene Doyle / Diana Waters vs Kathleen Helton / Ann Loehr6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRenee Bradford / Jena Wise vs Debbie Cook / Tami McGhee0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Arlene Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Carly Russell
published 4
3.64
Whitney Sumrall
published
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.51
Dawn Marino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Blair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlene Doyle + Renee Bradford7066% gamesnot enough data
Jena Wise + Renee Bradford033 matchesnot enough data
Arlene Doyle + Whitney Sumrall303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arlene Doyle
116W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
4.06
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Whitney Sumrall
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dawn Marino
69W–111L career · 9 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
3.44
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.