Teams

Piedmont 18s 4.5 Mixed

2026 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 18 · 4.5 Mxd Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28vs Benda 18s 4.5 Mixed Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrad Falvey / Jennifer Mays vs Kate Meiners / Chris Terrell2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Speight / Tommy Houston vs Allison Johnson / Matthew James6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Benda 18s 4.5 Mixed Wed PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrad Falvey / Jennifer Mays vs Matthew James / Kate Meiners0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Speight / Ryan Ingram vs Melissa Agner / Michael Parker3-6, 3-6
2026-07-14vs Benda 18s 4.5 Mixed Wed PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMason Norman / Jennifer Mays vs Allison Johnson / Matt Hughes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Falvey / Morgan Danford vs Kajsa Gedlitschka / Jack Oldis7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Owens / Tommy Houston vs Annabel Weyand Norman / Matthew James4-6, 2-6
2026-06-21vs Benda 18s 4.5 Mixed Wed PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesTommy Houston / Morgan Danford vs Melissa Agner / Matt Hughes7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Ingram / Denise Speight vs Kajsa Gedlitschka / Jack Oldis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Ivey / Josue Sanchez vs Nancy Benda / Michael Parker1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Mxd Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Denise Speight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Morgan Danford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.31
Tommy Houston
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Ryan Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Josue Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Jane Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Brad Falvey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Mason Norman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Lauren Ivey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jennifer Mays
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Falvey + Jennifer Mays123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Speight
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.43
Morgan Danford
35W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
4.36
Tommy Houston
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Ryan Ingram
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
Josue Sanchez
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.14
Jane Owens
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Brad Falvey
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Mason Norman
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Lauren Ivey
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Jennifer Mays
70W–42L career · 10 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.